English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 Kings 2:19-11-- If you are familure with this passage what are your comments on this?

2007-06-16 07:29:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

I think the whirlwind and chariots of fire would be a lot more interesting!

As for the 2 Kings passage ... These chariots and horsemen symbolized strong protection as well as the forces of God’s spiritual presence which were the true safety of His people. He also took up the mantle of Elijah that had fallen from him: Since the mantle was the special mark of a prophet, this was a demonstration of the truth that Elisha truly had inherited the ministry of Elijah. The mantle did not fall from heaven and rest on his shoulders; he had to decide to pick it up and put it on. He had to decide: do I really want to put this on? It had to be something else to measure up to Elijah!

2007-06-16 07:43:52 · answer #1 · answered by thundercatt9 7 · 1 0

Yeah. If you read that passage 100 years ago, it just looks like angels. But since we live in the future, that passage does look more and more like an alien kidnapping right out of X- Files.
Is our DNA alien? Did they give us religion?

2007-06-16 07:38:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sorry, I can't comment. I'm not "familure" with the passage.

2007-06-16 07:50:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes I think so because many people have seen UFOs.

Here are other people talking about UFOs & paranormal things.

If these links does not work, I have all these videos linked on my blog.

2007-06-16 14:19:48 · answer #4 · answered by learning_x 3 · 0 0

Albert Pujols is a freakin space man.

2007-06-16 07:32:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If Betty and Barney Hill were taken, why not Elijah?

2007-06-16 07:35:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well not "UFOs" but being that the Angels are "alien" to us then yes.

2007-06-16 07:43:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I seen that on the discovery channel, or was the history channel? Anyways, no.

2007-06-16 07:37:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't read it that way, but that would be funny if it was true.

2007-06-16 07:32:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I do....even though he was a bullfrog...3dognight..

2007-06-16 07:39:25 · answer #10 · answered by kit walker 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers