English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We want to reduce dependency on foreign oil. A 55 mile per hour speed limit would reduce oil usuage I am told to eliminate the need to import oil.

2007-06-16 05:54:40 · 7 answers · asked by Boveglio 1 in Cars & Transportation Commuting

7 answers

This would not completely eliminate dependence on foreign oil, but it would greatly reduce it (provided, of course, that people obeyed, which they probably won't).

2007-06-16 20:43:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

A reduction -- maybe. Eliminate foreign oil? No. I guess you are too young to remember the oil embargo of the seventies. The dopes in Washington tried to save oil by reducing the speed limit to 55. The nation lost more money on wasted time and loss of production than any savings on oil costs. The public hated it, voted out the dimwits that created it and it became a national blue law two years after it was enacted. Remember -- the U.S. has more crude in ANWAR than the entire mideast has. The dopey tree huggers and democrats block every measure proposed to drill and pump it out.
Go figure....

2007-06-16 13:40:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This was tried in the 70's and 80's. It did not work then, and it will not work now!! The way to reduce the dependence on foreign oil is to increase domestic production. Dill offshore and in ANWAR. Build new refineries. We need to quit letting the tree hugging wackos stop all new exploration!

2007-06-16 06:41:24 · answer #3 · answered by fire4511 7 · 1 0

No, that would only lower our dependency on foreign oil. The only way to eliminate our dependency on foreign oil would be to find an alternative source of energy for automobiles.

2007-06-16 06:03:22 · answer #4 · answered by Mike 2 · 0 0

Dude: interior the 70s i replaced right into a a motorbike highway racer. suitable velocity a hundred and ten on a great day and that i ought to overcome absolutely everyone in a a million/4 mile race. I undergo in recommendations whilst Reagan (MY Hero!) ran up $470 Billion deficits, just to overcome those pesky Rooskies to win/end the chilly conflict. He advised a great humorous tale to Gorbachev in Iceland and Gorbachev laughed at it: (He accumulated jokes approximately Soviet Union) A Russian guy replaced into at domicile and his spouse stated "we are out of bread". So the guy wend to the bread shop, stood in line for hours and whilst he have been given to the front of the line, the shop stated "we are closed, not extra bread". The husband freaked out, merely lost it and commenced yelling "Communism is failing!" and so on and ranted on for a couple of minutes. of path a KGB Agent wearing a trenchcoat approached him, saying "Comrad, bypass domicile, we can't have you ever appearing like this". So the husband went domicile and his spouse asked "What, they're out of bread back?" Husband stated "that is even worse than that! they're out of bullets too!"

2016-10-17 11:29:38 · answer #5 · answered by balok 4 · 0 0

Thats highly unlikely since we would still need oil. The problem is we are not using our oil The US has oil we just dont use it.

2007-06-16 06:06:09 · answer #6 · answered by henrysol 4 · 1 0

No. You listen to stupid people.

2007-06-16 06:15:00 · answer #7 · answered by Iknowthisone 7 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers