I do not think we are that competent to comment upon such topics, which is beyond our understanding and capacity. Better try to develop love upon God.
2007-06-16 03:55:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by durga v 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Rukmani and Satyabhama were Krishna's wives. Radha was his childhood, true love.
Monarchy doesn't exist any more. Today we are all commoners. In those days too commoners did not have this privilege. Only kings had. And Lord Krishna was God in the form of a king.
2007-06-16 10:52:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by kumarcl 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
first understand what is divine love, next understand who is Krishna, and further understand what he did.
and with atleast some basic understanding which even small kids at the age of 7 or 8 have by preliminary knowledge they would have accrued by listening to there parents etc, come back and ask questions pertaining to this topic.
No matter, still as you have raised the topic of Krishna, you are at no danger, because even a enemy of Krishna, by his enmity always remembers Hari and gets liberated.
good luck.
-deito.
2007-06-17 01:10:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by deito 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
unfortunately Krishna preceded the daysof Muhammed , les he would hae become a Muslim and maried one more lady as Isalm sanctions four wives besides a hoard of concubines that the man could provide for .
Now we ar in the modern days , an evironment that id far different from what obtained some six thousand years ago.To examine the practices that obtaine in a society some six thusand yeas ago ,in the light of the experience and practices that now obtains in a society is itself somethin weired and unintelligent . Men hae beenhavoin many wies in the ancient times and Kings have been having hundreds and thousands of wives .Almost all teh gods have been portrayed as having minimu two wies and many have been havin moe too.
Lord shiv is said to hae Parathy and Ganga .Vishnu , lakshmi and boomadevi.,lord Muruga , Valli and Devayanai.and so on.
So Krihna also seem to have had three.may be the three names might be the diferent names of he same individual, just like the Sahasranamas of he Gods themselves! .Any how it was not lkie the present day practice of having a secret paramour .solewt us not bother about the njumber of consorts of the gods as in many cases a numer of women have been doing penance to become the spouse of the same god who is already having one or more spouses .
Any how the Act preventing the Hindus alone from having a second wife was nt passed by our parliament at the time Lord Kraihna and other gods descended on the earth.so their marriages with multiple partners was quie legal.and we can not proceed against them now !
2007-06-16 12:22:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Infinity 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
i think this is a sarcastic remark. why don't you read krishnavatar in brief. u get many books. on krishnavatar. u will understand the real meaning of love.rukmini & satyabhama were his wives. you can't compare radha's love towards krishna to anything in this world.but ofcourse i don't think u know what is love. so, how can u understand DEVINE LOVE ?
2007-06-16 11:08:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You ask other religious people-how many of the males and females love their G--O--D= GOD.All the femeles who love their GOD -will you take it in the mundane sense.The males who say they love their God,will you call them"----"--"Love" has a broad sense-Loving father, mother, brother, sister, uncle,grand children is not always related to conjugal relationship--a person thinking in that way has a "sick" mind-Love betwen Jeeva(individual soul) and Parama(Universal soul-GOD)is portrayed in stories for common people to understand.Even Meera,Chacku,Brindha,Aandal(Females), Ragavendra,Kanaka Das,sri.Krishna Chaitanya Prabhu(males) all "Love"d GOD Krishna-Don't have a "Sick" mind(the word Female has not fully appeared)
2007-06-16 11:06:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by ssrvj 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are text loves!!
2007-06-18 00:04:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋