2007-06-15 13:31:09 · 61 answers · asked by ? 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Unless they are a lesbian that like to have manly legs...I'd say yes....
2007-06-15 13:34:18 · answer #1 · answered by Rmprrmbouncer 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no.. what is it with men and not wanting women to not have hairy legs. do you know what they have to go thought to get it off. now i not crazy about hairy legs but what the big deal and why call it a sin.. do you think eve had shaved legs??? NO i would who thought it was a good idea. go back in history and think when did they start shaving leg. in most parts of the world they still do NOT.. so it the good old USA and Hollywood know how. SIN where do you get off saying it a sin.. boy people sure think small when they think sin. in my day a SIN was something big.. you know killing, raping, stealing....hairy legs that not even a gain of sand on the beaches of sin.
2007-06-15 13:40:40 · answer #2 · answered by jackie 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not more than a man wearing a shrots with (ack) hairy legs or showing hair in underarms & chest..... I personally find hairy guys disgusting!
Guys - it's not macho its just repulsive
P.S. For the bodybuilders & professional swimming athletes shaving seems to be a must.
2007-06-15 19:50:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Especially spandex shorts because women who do that sort of thing with spandex and the hairy leg thing usually have a pretty good case of the cottage cheese thighs too.
The only thing worse I think though is shorts with panty hose
2007-06-15 13:50:23 · answer #4 · answered by Midge 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a sin, but I see where you going with that word. It's considered offensive because in many countries women who show skin, have smooth 'femine' skin. Our burden that society gave us......
But just because it is a pain in the butt to shave, pluck, and wax. For me it doesn't give another women an excuse NOT too. Hey, you want to skip the silky smooth....cover it up. Because it really does bother me. You might be different. But this is how society has dictated for generations..women shouldn't have facial hair, hairy legs or pits, and walk around without their shirts on! lol
We get to sweat in the summer...cut or burn ourselves with hair removing techniques...all to be women.
In the end...it's worth it. ;-)
2007-06-15 13:38:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, unless you take the line that because hairy legs are caused by high levels of male hormones the woman is attempting to blur the distinction between male and female by advertising her masculine features.
2007-06-17 22:48:33 · answer #6 · answered by Feinschmecker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have never seen a pair of shorts with hairy legs.
2007-06-15 13:34:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look, men get away with kinds of gross and disgusting stuff. Lets worry about the scaring they are inflicting before we go worrying about the less hairy leg of a woman.
2007-06-15 13:35:57 · answer #8 · answered by Edhelosa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not if western society makes it into a trend. I mean western woman follow societies ideals of beauty as if they are here to serve men.
I'm sure if some Hollywood actors started coming on screen with a peg leg and one eye....
It would be a trend
and these things should be posted in the jokes/humor section
2007-06-15 13:41:53 · answer #9 · answered by ۩MoonLit Muslima۩ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Newp
Shorts don't generally have hairy legs...
Do you mean women with hairy legs to wear shorts?
Nah.
I understand that it is a pain in the rump to shave. It is my personal preference to have shorn legs.
2007-06-15 13:35:00 · answer #10 · answered by MamiZorro2 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So only people with blond hair can wear shorts with hairy legs, since their hairs are blond and can't really be seen? Now, that's just discrimination!! so...No!!
2007-06-15 13:36:35 · answer #11 · answered by FaceFullofFashion 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋