English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Well, ok, 10 is an arbitrary number, lets say more than 3? Should we take into consideration how China got to be overpopulated? Doesnt anyone see that we are headed that way? Thanks, gay people.

2007-06-15 10:21:26 · 12 answers · asked by get dent 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

12 answers

I sure dont eat children....HAHA!!

2007-06-15 10:25:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

1. Gluttony is about what/how much goes into your body, not what comes out.

2. If you can feed, clothe, and manage 3 or 10 kids, then there isn't a problem.

3. Overpopulation is an idiotic myth perpetuated by leftists who see the world as a god rather than seeing God as the controller of the world.

4. China is only "overpopulated" because they know that a growing population is a problem for any repressive police state and by limiting their population, they can head off potential rebellions.

5. The entire population of the world would fit in Texas with every person having just over 2000 square feet. Put down the Paul Erlich book and take a deep breath.

2007-06-15 17:32:03 · answer #2 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 1 0

Not unless you're eating the children. Gluttony is overeating, and doesn't have any identifiable connection to having too many children. Over-population is a valid concern, but as long as natural calamities befall us, disease and violence run rampant, and we display an unfortunate tendency to engage in wars there will always be means of trimming the numbers of souls walking the Earth. Too many means, in fact.

2007-06-15 17:31:13 · answer #3 · answered by Captain S 7 · 1 0

Gluttony? Hardly. Have you ever tried to fix the plates of three children simultaneously, get the children washed and to the table, mop up the milk they inevitably spill, and still get even one single bite of food to your mouth while it's still warm?

China uses forced abortions as population control. Everybody's allowed only one child. Sorry, wouldn't want to emulate them.

2007-06-15 17:27:49 · answer #4 · answered by hoff_mom 4 · 0 0

This really depends on whether you consume them all at once or if you space out your meals over a few weeks. I never eat more than a single child in a week- unless they are particularly small. I too want my baby-back ribs!

2007-06-15 17:49:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Gluttony has nothing to do with parenting kids...not sure where you were going with that. Anyway, having a large family is most certainly not a sin.

2007-06-15 17:29:12 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

GLUTONY means eating in excess...
are you gonna EAT the KIDS?

2007-06-15 17:35:35 · answer #7 · answered by Kerilyn 7 · 1 0

Not unless you eat them. And don't call me a gay person, the PC word is sexually orientationally challenged.

2007-06-15 17:29:24 · answer #8 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 0 0

Well I pay for other peoples gluttony then as I have 3 kids that aren't even mine.

2007-06-15 17:26:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well, I have 9 brothers and sisters and I love every one of them and we weren't on Welfare so what's it to you?

2007-06-15 17:35:46 · answer #10 · answered by Midge 7 · 1 0

Only if you're having them so as to eat them

2007-06-15 17:25:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers