Atheists: besides Science, is there any other evidence that proof , God doesn't exist?

Question

Again!!!

DON'T USE "SCIENCE" BECAUSE WE ARE NOT IN A BIOLOGY OR SCIENCE CLASS

Be more creative! Maybe this time you can win!

well atheists alwasys say that Science disaproved the existance of God, that's why a posted this question

SvetlanaFunGirl: i agree pink unicorns does not exist - but God is Real

Amen!!

Answer 1

LOL. There's so much wrong with this I wouldn't know where to begin.

Assuming you're serious, this is one of the most pathetically desperate things I've read here.
======================
"well atheists alwasys say that Science disaproved the existance of God, that's why a posted this question"

Nope. You just made that up.

Have you ever wondered why believers have to lie so much to defend their beliefs? You should.

Answer 2

Well, science is the only real proof of anything. Everything else is called faith. Faith is the reason why people believe that someone is there, even though it can really be proved. So to try to disprove the existence of God, or anything else, without the aid of science, is impossible.

Also, I think that the existence of God is not something that CAN be proved or disproved by science. For all of the things that we know now because of science, there are more things that we don't know. There will always be the question of where something originated. Each time science finds the answer, then there will be the question of where THAT thing originated, and so on, and so on. Not only that, but there will always be people who simply will not believe a scientific answer.

Answer 3

Some proofs for me are... I exist. I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Birds, fish, and flowers have designs that are like from an artist- detailed, skilled, beautiful. The great crowd of witnesses throughout history, writings, and the domino effect. I believe good and evil each have a source. But mostly, I do not think it is logical to conclude that intelligence could come from nonintelligence. That a car has to have a maker, a watch has to have a designer. The odds of putting all the pieces of a watch in a bag, and shaking it, and being able to pull out a working clock are easier for me to believe than life suddenly existing all on it's own.

Answer 4

LOL

Science cant prove God dosent exist, it only deals with tangible material things [which God isnt] i asked the same kind of question some days ago [thats why im thinking it is funny].

some [not all of them] Atheists usually say that:
A] Science is proof enough [which is simply not true]
B] There is no proof he exists there is no proof he dosent so its just more simple to think that he didnt [if its more simple than it has more chance of being true]. Again i disagree that the theory that there is no God is simpler than the theory of the existance of God
C] Religions do not base themselves on rational explanation [again it is just not truth

A, B and C are just things I heard, im not tryng to generalise and some atheists have far better arguments than A, B and C. Still, lately ive been bombed with atheist ideas and concepts and i just cant get out of my head how unreasonable it is. Of course some atheist feel the same way about God and back up the way they feel with reasonal argumentation .

Paz de Cristo

Answer 5

How many times do we have to explain? It is your job to prove that God exists. There is no evidence that God or anything like God exists. There is more evidence that UFOs are alien spacecraft than proof that God exists.

God is not required for the creation of the universe or the earth or life; there is a much simpler explanation for all of that.

Belief in God requires believing that somewhere beyond time and space there is an all powerful, supermagical, intellgient being that can create something out of nothing by force of will and that for some reason that being is interested in the fates of some meat puppets on one little non-descript dirtball in a far-flung corner of the universe.

You have to have a pretty wild imagination to believe that.

Answer 6

Umm....that was almost a question. Try this:

Logic: It is person making the positive claim that needs to provide proof.

Necessity: How is it necessaryfor a god to exist.

Multiple Choice: If a god existed, how do you know its the concept of god that you believe in? What if it's several gods, or a universal force?

Knowledge: If god(s) do exist, what does it/he/they want? How can you be certain?

Logic again: If a supernatural creator existed, why do differing concepts about him exist? Wouldn't the truth be self obvious?

Evil: Why would an all powerful god allow suffering unless he/it/they intend for us to suffer?

Ego: What kind of arrogance drives people to assume that an entire universe exist for no other purpose than to bring about human life?

Answer 7

Just because you're not in a biology class, it doesn't mean that a scientific answer isn't relevant. Asking an Atheist to prove that God doesn't exist without using science is like asking a Christian to prove God does exist without using the Bible or faith as references. This is really a stupid question, and you're just looking for a fight.

Answer 8

science is the way to explain the universe and its workings.

what you ask is stupid. You are saying "use fantasy logic to argue".

Its like you are arguing if captain kirk or that other bald guy are better characters and I'm telling you that **** aint real, its just a show.

you are saying "don't use logic, or proof, or anything" just make **** up like I do. You want that then here goes:


The flying spaghetti monster exists, god doesn't, see his noodly appendage keeps us all rooted and planted to the earth because gravity (a scientific concept) is a myth.

This is fact because people are much taller now than 200 years ago and there are more people, therefore he has less noodly appendages to go around to keep us all held to the earth as his loving children.

thus the flying spaghetti monster is the creator of the universe who guides us and nurtures us.

it is fact because the gospel of the flying spaghetti monster says so.

you should read it so your soul will be saved.

Answer 9

the majority of studies in the area show an inverse relationship between intelligence and religiosity.

since there must be statisitcal significance indicator of the possibility of the least intelligent coming up with the correct answer to a given question I recon we could statistically prove by the frequency of 'yes' answers to the question 'does god exist' that god does not exist.

Aooooooooooooooooo
how's that creative angle bite ya?
Buff.

Answer 10

How about basic logic?

There are things that are impossible to do. For example nobody can cover a two-dimensional surface with two-dimensional circles, without making them overlap. It is impossible to add the numbers two and two and get 666. You can not go back in time (without passing an infinite entropy barrier). The number of things that are impossible to do are almost infinite. If god were to be almighty he would be able to do them, but it's impossible to do so.

Some people say that he can only do things that are logically possible to do, but what is? Is it logically possible to walk on water? Is it logically possible to rise from the dead? Is it logically possible to stand above time, space and all other dimensions - and still exist? I'd say that everything which violates the laws of physics are logically impossible and thus omnipotence is logically impossible. Besides if omnipotence is a relative quality there is no way to tell omnipotence from non-omnipotence. For omnipotence to be a valid expression it must be absolute, but we have no objective criteria to measure omnipotence so the word itself is useless.

Another way to disprove the almighty god is that omnipotence leads to paradoxes. Can god make a rock that is too heavy for him to carry? Can god build a wall that even he can't tear down?

Also, if god knows everything, he knows what he will do in the "future" (in any dimension, not necessary the time dimension). He must have known that from the very start of his own existence. Thus god's actions are predestined. God is tied by faith, he has no free will. If god has no free will god is not omnipotent. Another way to put it is that to be able to make plans and decisions one must act over time. If god stands above time he can not do that and has no free will. Indeed, if god stands above all dimensions god is dimensionless - a singularity, nothing, void!

Besides there can exist no free wills at all if god is almighty. If you had a free will, god wouldn't know what you would do tomorrow and wouldn't be omnipotent.

Answer 11

When did science "prove" that God doessn't exist?
Is there some scientific journal I can read about this "proof" in?
Or are you talking about the false "proof" so many of the junior atheists in this forum throw up as either an attack on Christians...or, sad to say, a shield against them?
Science is a great tool, don't ever scoff at the great things science has brought to us.
But science will never discover all there is to be discovered...least of all any "proof" either for or against God. To even suppose otherwise is either sheer idiocy, or incredible arrogance.
Or both...