2007-06-15 02:10:11 · 5 answers · asked by the_fuz03 1 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cameras
yes it is good
also
my suggestion
go to yahoo shopping
digital cameras
digital camera GUIDE
be sure to check titles on the left side
the guide should answer your questions
2007-06-15 05:35:10 · answer #1 · answered by Elvis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you mean the C875. It actually has pretty good specs. 8.0 megapixels is more than most people need. 5x zoom is better than average for point and shoot models.
Most digital cameras today take good to excellent pictures. This is why film and paper are fast becoming obsolete. While Kodak isn't the leader in digital cameras, they still make a decent product. They also offer pretty decent pricing as well as they're trying to regain market share.
I don't think there would be much difference between this and a comparable model from any of the large Japanese manufacturers.
2007-06-15 09:41:11 · answer #2 · answered by Glennroid 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a fan of Kodak, they are very boxy and they are a pain in the butt to carry around! and they are very expensive! if it was my money, I would look in to Canon! I will say Kodak at one time was the best out their in the world of photography but no longer!
Thank You,
Bob
2007-06-19 09:57:13 · answer #3 · answered by Bob 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my opinion i think that Kodak cameras suckk!.
try getting a sony. or something like that.
kodaks are not good.
they would be the one of the last cameras i would get
2007-06-15 10:22:53 · answer #4 · answered by Consti 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kodack sucks. They are dead last when it comes to digital.
Fuji is #1. Buy a fuji digital camera, well worth it.
2007-06-15 09:14:28 · answer #5 · answered by whymewhynow 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋