http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070614/ap_on_he_me/kids_food
The URL above goes to an article discussing Kellog's agreement to meat certain guidelines and regulations concerning nutritional content and advertising for children's cereals. The agreed to meet these items as a way to avoid a lawsuit from two children's obesity awareness groups and two sets of parents in MA.
While I fully support the need for children's foods to be healthier and the need to control advertising geared towards young children, I find myself wondering why we feel that we can sue any company that is doing something we don't agree with. Obesity...childhood and otherwise..is a major problem in the US. Childhood obesity is shoothing through the roof and, yes, part of the problem comes from what our kids have available to eat. Yes, we parents can use all the help they can get in making healthy choices, so getting foods our kids like to be healthier isn't a bad idea. But the biggest issue for obesity isn't
2007-06-15
01:52:14
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Annie
6
in
Pregnancy & Parenting
➔ Parenting
what we eat, but the things we don't do. Our kids don't get to spend afternoons after school running around...there is homework, security issues and daycare. Families have less time for acticities like hiking and biking...and it is proven kids are learning physical fitness from parents..because Mom and Dad must work longer hours to meet the bare minimums. And, we are a technology obsessed society...cars, DVD's, hi-def..all of it takes us further from moving and exercising.
So, why do we insist on making a legal case over an issue that, for the most part, is based not on decsisions made in a corporate boardroom, but ones made at the dinner table and influenced by things like time, money and family decisions?
2007-06-15
01:56:32 ·
update #1