well i just think theres gonna b a war soon watta u think
2007-06-14 23:20:01 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
yep a war from the literate against those who can't spell.
2007-06-14 23:22:49 · answer #1 · answered by Kevinlad 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, there will be no WW3. By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.
The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.
Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.
While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.
At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side.... In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself.
2007-06-15 09:45:55 · answer #2 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hi, I sure hope you are wrong, and I also believe you are. why? The weapons now, can destroy our earth many times, I don`t believe anyone will start the end, so to speak, but hey, I might be wrong, let us hope I`m not. I do believe the world have come a bit further than back in 1939-40 to 1945, but who knows? Education can make people understand that we are not that different when we think about it, maybe the world are going into an area with peace and understanding. well nobody knows I guess, anyway, peace and love from Norway
2007-06-14 23:40:34 · answer #3 · answered by thefallen 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not really. If there is WW3, that means UN failed to function as League of nations prior to WW2.
Well, if UNSC is malfunction, there will be another war, of course.
2007-06-14 23:35:19 · answer #4 · answered by Ping 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you listen to Glenn Beck? There is already a war going on in Afghanistan and we are policing Iraq. WW-III? Nah.
2007-06-14 23:23:30 · answer #5 · answered by apple juice 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yup. But don't worry, the US with it's tech which is light-years ahead of other countries (this tech is for conventional warfare, not guerilla) will cream it's enemies. Our population will shrink, but we will win in the end.
2007-06-15 02:45:37 · answer #6 · answered by F-14Dude 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The world IS ALREADY in WWIII, ie, The Global War On Terror!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-06-15 08:07:30 · answer #7 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
With thick headed people running the show, I'm sure you are correct.
2007-06-14 23:23:12 · answer #8 · answered by Jadochop 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no...were still stuck in a ww 2 mentality....thanks to curious george and his dad
2007-06-14 23:25:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well I think if you keep saying it long enough, sooner or later you'll be right.
2007-06-14 23:22:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋