English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

One of the main reasons against this is rape. It DOES happen. Don't fool yourself. There are countless times were rape has occured between one male soldier and another. The liberal media does not report on this because they have an agenda to make you think there is nothing wrong at all with being gay.

If you don't think gays are deviants, let me ask you this:

If you had a 5 year-old son, would you let him spend the night with ten gay guys? Of course not.

Not all gays are deviants, but alot are. If he was spending the night with just one gay person, the chances of him being molested may not be that high, but with ten? The chances are close to 100%.

This brings me back to the army. If you have just one gay person, the chances of rape are small, but if you have hundreds or thousands? It WILL happen.

If you disagree, then tell me you would let your kid sleep at a house with 10 gay guys.

What's that? You wouldn't?

I didn't think so.

2007-06-14 20:48:21 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

22 answers

Hey man, SOMEONE has to take point! Here's george carlins take on how to handle iraq I LOVE THIS IDEA!Bush wants us to cut the amount of gas we use ;
>
>The best way to stop using so much gas is to deport 11 million illegal
>immigrants!
>There would be 11 million less people using our gas. The price of gas
>would come
>down. Bring our troops home from Iraq to guard the border. When they
>catch an
>illegal immigrant crossing the border, hand him a canteen, rifle and
>some ammo
>and ship him to Iraq. Tell him if he wants to come to America then he
>must serve a
>tour in the military. Give him a soldier's pay while he's there and tax
>him on it.
>After his tour, he will be allowed to become a citizen since he defended
>this country.
>He will also be registered to be taxed and be a legal patriot. This
>option will probably
>deter illegal immigration and provide a solution for the troops in Iraq
>and the aliens
>trying to make a better life for themselves. If they refuse to serve,
>ship them to Iraq
>anyway, without the canteen, rifle or ammo. Problem solved. If you think
>this is a good solution to both the problems, forward it to your
>friends.

2007-06-14 20:51:26 · answer #1 · answered by TRboi 4 · 1 3

Where to even begin. For starters, every branch of the military has its share of gay people, and I doubt ANY soldiers are afraid of being raped by the big bad homos. The fact that you think it happens all the time, but the "lib media" (LOL...please) doesn't report it, is just hilarious. "Let me ask you this": if YOU were in the military, would YOU be afraid of getting raped by gay soldiers? If so, pause for a moment while we all pee our pants laughing at you.

I'm sure there are plenty of instances of consensual homosexual sex between soldiers, though - even though it's against the rules! Get a couple guys alone for an extended period with no women, and it happens. Happens in prison, happens in the military. Happens all the time. Doesn't even mean they're "gay," but it happens.

Secondly, it's cute that you then launch into this bizarre line of questioning having to do with whether people would leave their kids alone with 10 gay guys for the night. What this has to do with anything, other than your own diseased imagination, is beyond me and everybody. Certainly it has no relation to your "question." But no, I'm sure most people would not send their child off for a sleepover with 10 adult gay men. So yeah, you've really proved a point there.

You know, 99% of pedophiles are heterosexual. But of course that's irrelevant.

If you don't like gay people, fine. If you don't want to associate with them, fine. Nobody gives a damn. But they DO serve in the military and they will continue to serve, even under our bigoted and hypocritical "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

2007-06-16 03:51:32 · answer #2 · answered by jonjon418 6 · 1 0

Obviously you do not know what you are talking about. Homosexul men, are men who like other men. Not 5 year old boys. That is called paedophillia and is a completey different thing.

Leaving you child with 10 heterosexual men has just as many chances of being molested. But then why would you feel the need to leave your child with 10 men anyway.

Isn't everyone entitled to help their country?

2007-06-15 22:01:26 · answer #3 · answered by Sarcasma 5 · 1 0

So, is this a question, or a rant? If it's a question, I haven't been able to find it. OH, wait a minute, is that it? "If you had a 5 year old son, would you let him spend the night with ten gay guys?" Hmmm. Let me ask you two. If you had a 5 year old CHILD, would you let him/her spend the night with ten adults? If you had a 5 year old daughter, would you let her spend the night with ten lesbians?

Rape occurs to both sexes. That dog don't hunt. Statistically, homosexuals have served in the military, ALL military branches in ALL countries, for millenia. They are neither worst, nor better, than straight military members. You are homophobic.

2007-06-14 21:29:43 · answer #4 · answered by My world 6 · 5 0

By that line of thinking, gays shouldn't be allowed on red-eye flights or in hotels, either.

Also, 5 year olds aren't allowed in the military, and a person's sex drive hasn't picked in yet, which mutes argument #3.

You insinuate in your fourth point that all homosexuals are sex-crazed maniacs, who cannot control themselves if they slept in the same room with another man. This is nonsense.

Yes, rapes to happen. But they happen outside of the military, too. In fact, I'm willing to bet that almost all reported rapes occur outside of the military, considering the military:non-military ratio.

There's no real valid reason to prevent homosexuals to enter the military, and many currently serve. The only thing that keeps the ban in place is past precedence. If a homosexual male were denied a job in any private company, because he/she were homosexual, it would violate Equal Opportunity laws. The military, other than places of worship, are the only place that deny a person a job based on his/her sexual orientation.

I'm not gay, nor in the military, but homosexuals being banned from the military is wrong.

2007-06-14 21:27:59 · answer #5 · answered by amg503 7 · 5 0

Women are sometimes raped by men in the military as well. Do you think women should not be allowed to enlist? By your logic, since it's the men who do the raping of women, perhaps it's men who should not be allowed to enlist.

If you had a 5 year old daughter, would you allow her to spend the night with ten straight men?

Not all straight men have deviant sex-power trips, but some do.

I disagree with you 100%.

2007-06-15 19:49:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I just want to point out a little flaw in your argument. Women who are victims of rape - are they raped by gay people or straight people. That's right by straight people. So by your logic would you like your daughter to be in a bar with 10 men in it? Are rapists not deviants? Of course they are! You stated it yourself regarding gay rape. Therefore the army is full of both straight and gay soldiers ALL of whom are potential deviants by your reasoning. Thus the army should ban straight and gay people and only take castrated men as recruits - if you follow your warped reasoning.

2007-06-14 22:53:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

What can we predict of approximately females serving brazenly interior the armed forces? i do no longer likely see how the subject concerns are any distinctive until you're utilising some nineteenth century widely used of Christian morality. possibly the armed forces is the final bastion of the US government that applies such idiotic standards, and doubtless those standards bypass away whilst they detect that they've not got sufficient volunteers and/or we get some politicians with some guts. via the way, any argument approximately "adult males serving heavily jointly at close quarters" is hog-wash. See argument re females. Yeah, somebody who could be attracted on your inner maximum areas would, in specific cases, see them. vast whoop. because of the fact the final public of violent crimes are committed via HETEROSEXUAL adult males, if something, the gay adult males could be apprehensive. of course they're able to stand up for themselves. each and every thing else is merely bigotry.

2016-10-17 08:20:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i wouldn't let my kid sleep over at a house with ten gay "men" but if they were other ten gay boys the same age then yes, i wouldn't care ( i wouldn't even let my son stay with an older straight male, with family being the exception on both account) and if gays are willing to fight for our freedom then let them

2007-06-16 18:54:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If House Bill 1592 and Senate Bill 1105 Passes you won't even be able to say that without being put in jail and Fined! So much for the Free Speech Americans fought for! Two General's were already reprimanded and Fired about their postions on the matter, no matter if they were trying to keep people safe! Pace was one of them and they are not too crazy about Petraeus...

2007-06-14 22:26:29 · answer #10 · answered by ShadowCat 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers