I want sources that THE ENTIRE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY would respect.
I am not talking about a religious fanatic, who puts on a lab coat and calls him/herself a scientist.
The key word here is LEGITIMATE.
2007-06-14 14:47:14 · 4 answers · asked by The Walkin Dude 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Okay, how about the 'bulk' of the scientific community?
Can't expect 100 percent with much of anything that involves people.
2007-06-14 14:58:47 · update #1
None. Since I'm a member of the scientific community, and I cannot respect anyone who supports the Creation Museum, I can say quite confidently that there is no scientist respected by the ENTIRE scientific community who supports the Creation Museum. To the best of my knowledge, there is also no one who is respected as a scientist by a significant portion of the scientific community who supports the Creation Museum.
2007-06-14 14:55:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of course they can't because Scientist would never support the creation museum. Scientist educated them selfs and know better unlike Christians. Thats like Christians supporting the Gay pride parade.
2007-06-14 21:53:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No self-respecting scientist supports creationism over evoution or some other scientific quest for the truth. It would be the death of his/her career. And rightly so...
2007-06-14 21:57:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Good luck with that. They cannot cite any because none exist... just like their god.
2007-06-14 21:50:29 · answer #4 · answered by Rogue Scrapbooker 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋