Chuck Norris
2007-06-14 10:53:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Adoptive Father 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Dawkins.
1. He has actually studied biology so knows the best places to disable an opponent.
2. All he has to do is say "let us pray" at the start, and then get behind Robinson and kick him in the brain.
2007-06-14 17:57:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Simon T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, unless Pat Robertson is a liar (oh, but how could he be), he would turn the other cheek and Dawkins would win.
2007-06-14 17:54:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by WWTSD? 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I have seen Richard Dawkins when his idiotic "meme" theories were challenged by other scientists & media, and the monikers "crazed pitbull" and "slobbering rottweiller" have merit.
Pat Robertson on the other hand is first and foremost a soft-spoken gentleman. He would not lower himself to scream and howl, much less spit and slobber.
2007-06-14 18:06:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by faith 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who is Richard Dawkins?
Pastor Art
2007-06-14 17:55:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Pat reckons he can leg press 2,000 pounds. If he is telling the truth he would win owing to being super-human.
2007-06-14 17:55:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Citizen Justin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Robertson. He'd sic a hurricane on Dawkins, and then have his 500-foot Jesus step on him.
2007-06-14 17:55:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by SallyJM 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Perhaps I must be getting old, but I don't find these blah vs blah questions amusing.
Besides, it is clearly going to be Mr. Rogers in a blood-stained sweater.
2007-06-14 17:55:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dharma Nature 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Pat
2007-06-14 17:53:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Hopefully their collective intelligence would win out and they wouldn't fight
2007-06-14 17:55:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by siffu 3
·
1⤊
0⤋