Well, he lost his temper with the moneychangers in the temple, some would say justifiably, but anger is allegedly a sin. But hey, the guy was only human...sort of.
2007-06-14 09:48:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Always Curious 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, there isn't.
It should be noted that anger itself is not a sin. It can become a sin when directed in the wrong place, but Jesus showed righteously justified anger when he took on the moneychangers in the temple, who were themselves sinning.
I know that many people will try to knock Jesus' life, and attempt to find fault in what He did, but any perceived sin can be explained rationally without the outcome of sin. Jesus was perfect: 100% God and 100% man at the same time...
2007-06-14 17:17:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Greg 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Nope, in fact, the opposite...
"Therefore, since we have a great high priest who has gone through the heavens,[e] Jesus the Son of God, let us hold firmly to the faith we profess. For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are—yet was without sin." Hebrews 4:14-15
2007-06-14 16:50:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by artbyheather04 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes... He lost his temper with the money changers in the temple and beat them.
He blamed a fig tree for not having any fruits and caused it to whither.
He lost his nerve and asked that everything be changed before the crucifixion.
He showed massive intolerance toward others.
He showed his ego by teaching a good man would go to hell but a bad man would go to heaven if he prayed to him.
These things aren't necessarily things that happened but some things the Bible claims happened.
2007-06-14 16:53:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Don W 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Jesus was sent down from heaven, Wrapped in flesh and was to be the sacrafice to end all other sacrafices. His purpose for coming down as 100% God and 100% human was to shed blood as a PERFECT sacrafice to God so we as human beings would have a way to talk to God. If Christ had sinned all would be lost, but since he was 100% God he could not have sinned, so therefore Christ was spotless and was without sin, and mistakes. Perfection.
2007-06-14 16:49:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by pooey 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not really a mistake,but a change of viewpoint. originally he was opposed to teaching to gentiles ("pearls before swine"),but later in His personal ministry He reversed Himself.
2007-06-14 16:50:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brynn 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Jesus was and is perfect. He made no errors
2007-06-14 16:47:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Julie 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Jesus was without sin - no error, no evil in Him.
2007-06-14 16:49:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by jworks79604 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
2 YES and 4 NO's....
Some coherence, huh?
2007-06-14 16:52:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Doomsday 2
·
0⤊
1⤋