Let me get this straight-the proof of the fullfilled phrophecies are all in the same book as the phrophecies themselves?
2007-06-14 05:48:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The straight-forward answer is yes... for a convoluted explanation about why this is credible, you have to ask a bible believer.
2007-06-14 05:56:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not exactly. The book of Daniel predicted the rise and fall of the Babylonian, Persia/Median, Greek and Roman empires and the destruction of Jerusalem (happened in 70 AD). The only thing the book of Daniel confirms is the fall of Babylonian empire. The last completed book of the Old Testament is dated in the 5th Century BC. At this time the Persians and Medians were still in power but the things Daniel predicted came true especially the one about the great king from Grecia that would devour the land and then he would fall and his kingdom would be divided into 4.
2007-06-14 05:55:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The best way to answer that problem for yourself is to read the bible, and read a few history books. There are still things coming to pass, that are eerily similar to the things spoken of in the bible.
It takes a little work though.
However, if you dont believe it, dont stress it. Not everyone was meant to believe. Its only natural that if you are not a believer that you dont believe. Its no something to point fingers about or be nasty over.
2007-06-14 05:52:24 · answer #3 · answered by amosunknown 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The prophesies are in the Old testament.
The fulfillment is in four books written after the death of Christ. Matthew, Mark Luke and John.
You seem to think that this is all one book.
2007-06-14 05:51:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
History, as well as the Bible, shows that prophecies have been fulfilled. Try not to show your ignorance of what the prophecies were.
2007-06-14 05:53:07 · answer #5 · answered by singwritelaugh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL....I see where this is leading.....
yes they are...but....they were many many years apart and in order for the prophecies to be considered "fulfilled' they had to pass many many tests.....in order to have them fullfilled by just "anyone" would have taken some pretty fancy footwork!
Peace be with you :)
2007-06-14 05:54:11 · answer #6 · answered by ForeverSet 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, except for the destruction of Jersalem, the resurrection and the Judgement.
2007-06-14 05:52:42 · answer #7 · answered by I Wanna Know 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the prophecies were written years before most of the events....all you have to do is study history and compare it to the time of the prophecy
2007-06-14 05:54:12 · answer #8 · answered by ✞ Ephesians 2:8 ✞ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup. But don't worry, they were written hundreds of years apart. I don't think there was any collaboration between the writers. I don't think they copied off each other.
2007-06-14 05:52:15 · answer #9 · answered by Tina Goody-Two-Shoes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yah. isnt that ironic... hence why i never considered them valid.
not to mention a lot of the prophecies are also so extremely general, any moron could have come up with it.
2007-06-14 05:51:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋