I mean, there is evidence of a radioactive substance stored under thousands of layered rock that REALLY SUPPORTS the Big Bang Theoory. Also, the skeleton of "Lucy", the Australopithicine. ( I KNOW I didn't spell that right)
Isn't that pretty heavy proof?
Now, this is just me being me, voicing my heavy opinion, and the people reading this, yes of course, you can give your opinion too, but lets not get nasty, okay?
2007-06-14 05:07:22 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Nope, thanks for asking.
Evolution proven? When? Did I miss the press conference? Big Bang? How do you get an explosion of that magnitude from NOTHING?
2007-06-14 05:10:13 · answer #1 · answered by Sir Offenzalot 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
There are so many different thoughts on this subject that a lot of what is believed now days has originated from theory. My personal thought on the subject is, that it took God 6 days to create everything and on the 7th day he rested. I wonder just how many of the people out there have entertained the thought that 1 of God's days is 2000 of our days long and so if the big bang did occur, how do we know that God did not cause it and if he did, then that would mean that the 6 days mentioned in the Bible would have ib reality been 12,000 years. People are going to believe what they have been raised to believe, so it really doesn't matter about what I speculate about the subject. Satan's rain on Earth was to be for 2000 years according to the Bible. Also just how much of the Bible had been added onto since it was first written? We have only what others tell to believe, so the whole book could be made up, but I kind of dought it.
2007-06-14 12:26:33 · answer #2 · answered by golden rider 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's pieces of a puzzle, but once they had a Dog bone in a Dinosaur exhibit at a major museum. Great scientists, can't tell a dog bone from a dino bone!
Big Bang was postulated by a Catholic Priest
The Father of Genetics was a Catholic Abbott
The issue is
ARE YOU AN ACCIDENT
Or were you designed and created, you know, like an IPOD
It
2007-06-14 12:22:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one was around to witness the big bang. Where is the proof? The radioactive substance could have been place there by God. As far as Lucy is concerned, she is a monkey, ape that God created and is just another skeleton in the long line of apes. Thanks for your opinion.
2007-06-14 12:12:39 · answer #4 · answered by Kaliko 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, not sure about the big bang theory, but there's more than enough proof that evolution occurs. But Christians don't like proof, that's why they're still Christian. They're narrow minded and don't like listening to the truth and what makes sense. But they're usually born into Christianity and have been believing it their whole lives. It's tough for them to believe that their religion might've just been a waste of time.
2007-06-14 12:11:52 · answer #5 · answered by Ares 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yeah, that fossil is about a billion years old!
**EDIT** Christan's, you didn't witness god creating the world either-you never have a legitimate answer for anything! Check out the link, open your mind to some logic and facts. Maybe your life would be better if you stop believing in an imaginary guy that you think will solve all your problems. Has he yet? No, and as long as you think it will, you will always be miserable.
Former Christan, now a freethinker.
2007-06-14 12:13:15 · answer #6 · answered by science rules! 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe in the big bang theory. I actually think it happened in a series of gradual changes instead of one big bang. However we all know evolution exists, even if some of us do not accept the monkey-to-man thesis. Anyone who denies evolution exists on some level is a complete moron or an undereducated old-timer.
2007-06-14 12:11:38 · answer #7 · answered by ♨UFO♨ 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Big Bang is pretty shaky still, as conclusive proof for it would be elusive. I'd rate it as "The best possible theory we have." Evolution has been conclusively proven though, you've got a point there.
2007-06-14 12:11:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why are all the ladies concerned about the "Big Bang' Theory?
2007-06-14 12:12:01 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas Paine 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's a whole lot more evidence and data than those two lonely examples..
You make it sound as though that's all there is..????
Science is not in the business of proving things, but of explaining what is there...!
2007-06-14 12:14:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Australopithecine. Damn close. At least you didn't misspell "you"
It takes away a certain level of comfort for them. Some of them do not function without it.
LOL, Paien is singing the Sad Sappy Sucker song now
2007-06-14 12:13:09 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋