Well, for one, I don't trust polls. They tend to be biased towards a pre-determined conclusion, and don't speak for the majority of the country when they ask a small group standing on a street corner in a city such as San Francisco. We all know what they're like (They're so Anti-American they don't even want the Blue Angels to fly during Fleet Week).
I think they're mostly telling the truth. I'm sure they left a few things out, but it's mostly for national security reasons.
2007-06-13 19:32:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Karma 6
·
4⤊
5⤋
i do no longer locate it surprising, yet then I extremely have a clean memory of Watergate ... and the books Ehrlichman, Dean, and others wrote after their convictions ... they, too, have been knee-deep in corruption and knew it. by the time the Watergaters wrote their cathartic books, the administration replaced into (needless to say) no longer a sitting one and so no person had a vested activity in spinning ask your self and dismay. perhaps McClellan's is being spun using fact, on a similar time as Bush can not be re-elected, there may be a feeling that it will by some ability injury the social gathering (McCain) on the polls. Who is familiar with. all of it sounds a wee bit disingenuous. even regardless of the undeniable fact that it somewhat is a similar with this as with the different e book: The extra interest it somewhat is paid, the extra valuable it sells, and liberating it halfway by an election twelve months replaced into in all probability a advertising approach. i would be sure McClellan sitting back and smiling all a thank you to the financial company.
2016-10-17 05:23:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by prebor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
War and Globalization - The Truth Behind September 11 (9/11)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490
2007-06-13 20:32:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
HELL no. There are many things that happened during 9/11 that pretty much proves that the Bush Administration knew about the attack prior to the date. I personally believe it may have been a situation like Pearl Harbor, where Roosevelt knew about the attack going to happen, and let it happen so that Americans would be in the mood to fight. That's just what I think. There is a lot of information that you can research online. I hope that helps.
2007-06-13 19:38:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Imani 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
If you believe that Bush had something to do with 9/11 then you are giving Bush a lot of credit as being very intelligent on pulling something that complicated,now on the other hand everyone says how stupid he is,so he can't be both,you can't have it both ways,personally I don't think he or his administration is smart enough to pull something like that
2007-06-13 19:34:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not while the Bush empire and the other crooks that make up the Bush Administration are reaping such high rewards - these leaches are getting fat on the blood of the powerless.
2007-06-14 14:32:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but they don't want to tell the truth either.
That Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, George Soras and Larry Silverstien spent the last 3 years of thier administration planning the attack on the WTC.
Why else do you think Bill and Hillary moved to NY ?
Why else do you think Hillarys largest campaingn donor, just happened to buy the WTC 3 months before 911 ?
Why else do you think Clinton cut Air Defense Fighters from 150 fighters at 13 bases, to 13 fighters at 7 bases shortly before leaving office?
Why else would George Soras buy so much Halliburton stock ?
Why else would George Soras finance all the 911 conspiracy nuts who are trying to blame it on Bush ?
2007-06-13 19:35:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Any one who thinks that President Bush and his administration ISN'T hiding something have their heads in the sand.
I can hear the people who read my posts cringing and wondering what I'm up to... .
It's called "National Security" and only those with suicidal tendencies want them all revealed to the world.
OF COURSE THEY HAVE SECRETS! What kind of idiot would want to have someone in the White House would would reveal our national secrets? Why would we do so in the middle of a WAR!?
Get real. I'm in the 53%. He's hiding something. Bless him.
2007-06-13 19:33:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
The Bush administration not only is hiding something they are blatantly lying.
2007-06-13 19:36:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ambo 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I have a theory... he got a lot of money from companies that specialize in ground transportation. He also wanted to get re-elected. Wartime presidents are almost always re-elected, so there is one excuse. If he had planned it and done it himself, then no one would want to fly, so they would use ground transportation.... this is just a condensed version... send me a message if you want to talk more about this theory
2007-06-13 19:35:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by ace_of_spayeds 3
·
0⤊
1⤋