Who thinks Bush should be impeached?

Answer 1

For what? You can't impeach someone because things aren't going your way. Read up on impeachment, it will give you some insight to what impeachment is all about. Good Luck.

edit: Hey Kevin. What I am saying IS the case. FYI Bush didn't lie about going to war. I bet you can't name one single lie. The question has been brought up hundreds of times and not one factual lie has been presented. Congress approved it. Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, not for what he did. You have a Congress filled with a bunch of do-nothing Dems. If they had grounds for impeachment, it would be done. Don't kid yourself. Saddam broke 17 U.N. resolutions and screwed with the inspectors constantly.
edit: Bush isn't required to testify in front of a grand jury or under oath. No one is required to testify under oath unless they have been brought up on criminal charges. That hasn't happened, because there are none. It has to be that way, because if everyone was required to testify to appease someone, all politicians would be lined up non stop because somebody would say they lied and then they would be required to testify. It doesn't even make sense.
There WERE WMD's for crying out loud. Over 500 have been found since 2003. Saddam used them on his own people. Tell the Kurds they didn't exist. Sarin and mustard gas have been found.

Answer 2

He should have never been elected
... that is if he really Did win,

but yes he should be impeached and in jail!

Answer 3

If Clinton got impeached for lying about getting a hummer, then why on earth shouldn't Bush be impeached for lying about a reason to go to war and getting thousands of American soldiers killed in something that was basically his way to try and guaruntee himself a second term? In other words, he absolutely should have been impeached.

Edit: Harley, if what you're saying is the case, then Clinton never should have been impeached. Bush lied about evidence to go to war based off of faulty intelligence provided by his own cronies. How is that not a reason to impeach?! Edit : Then if that is the case, why doesn't bush go and testify under grand jury? If he is so sure that there is no lie, why is it that every time it is mentioned that the president, or his advisors at the time should be put under oath vs congress, they are somehow "protected by presidential privilige?" If they did nothing wrong, why are they so afraid to say what happened? SILENCE CONFIRMS GUILT!!!

Edit: Funninthesunn. Forget the fact that I don't agree with him, and forget the fact that countries believe something. If you kill my dog and tell me that somebody else did it and show me all these reasons of how this other person could have killed my dog, and I believe that you didn't kill my dog, that does not change the fact that you still killed my dog! Just because people believed that there were weapons of mass destruction, does not make it justifiable. The prime proof of the fact that he LIED is that there WERE no weapons that he said he knew, beyond a shadow of a doubt, were there. He LIED based on faulty information that he twisted to help suit his own beliefs, and if you can't see that then you are BLIND!!!

Answer 4

Let's just impeach every president we don't agree with completely even if everything they have done is completely within the scope of his duties and the law.

Before I start hearing he lied he lied, prove it. EVERY single country, except maybe Iraq, Iran and N Korea, agreed with the intelligence that the US had and Bush used to go to war. So unless you are about to scream for the impeachment of all the world leaders over this vast Iraq lying conspiracy, give it a rest.

You don't like a persons politics then don't vote for them or someone like them next time. But screaming for impeachment because of it is so old and tired and makes a mockery of our system of govt.


lol sundae, quoting Mussoulini to prove your point, way to go, well that makes me rethink my whole value system
So tell me, what small mom and pop company built the computer you are typing on right now or provided the internet service you are using on YAHOO right now? I forgot Yahoo isnt a big corporation, lol, what a hyppocrite.

Answer 5

What is it going to accomplish? The Democrats have enough votes in the House to pass the articles of impeachment, but they do not have enough votes in the Senate to get a conviction. If Democrats were to impeach him this close to the end of his term, it could perceived as an act of political revenge and cause them to lose their majority in both houses.

Answer 6

Bush and Cheney should both be impeached. We here in Texas know that Mr. Bush is a lying scumbag, who would do anything to hide his motives and his behavior to protect his precious image and reputation, which is as bogus as a four dollar bill. Evidence is being developed all the time against Dubya and Company concerning high crimes and misdemeanors, and we're not talking about oral sex here. As they say: It ain't over till the fat lady sings. And I haven't heard any arias lately.

Here's just one example of our "wonderful" president's behavior. He is a schemer, a scammer and a fraud, and this needs to be spread throughout the country.

http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A185124

Answer 7

No. Move on. We have far too many important things to do than spend months on this nonsense. Didn't you learn from the Clinton impeachment? It's a waste of time and money. Clinton's acquittal by the senate was a done deal as would be Bush's.

Forget it.

Answer 8

Absolutely.
I can't think of a President more deserving of impeachment.

-For consistently disregarding and weakening the constitution.
-For lying in order to get the United States in a war in Iraq.
-For consistent abuses of power (the wire taps).


For the love of... don't you get it??? IF YOU ACTUALLY THINK A COUNTRY HAS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, A LAND INVASION IS ABSOLUTELY OUT OF THE QUESTION!

Answer 9

I certainly do, but only if Cheney is impeached as well! *sm*

Answer 10

he should have been impeached March 2003.
the american political system is completely ineffective. it's a joke...you don't even vote on issues...you just elect either this millionare or that millionare every four years.
Government is controlled by corporations...and war profiteering, rather than social programs, developing your country internally. Corporation + Government = Fascism...
I didn't say it, Mussolini did (the father of fascism)