....was more head-on & also more enclosed.By that account more fuel & more structure damage occured in the 1st tower which was also hit earlier. Yet if fire was the reason for the pancake collapse why didn't the 1st tower fall earlier?
What made tower 7 2 fall?
Who is the anthrax terrorist?
How did he anticipate the 9/11 attacks to keep his military grade anthrax ready?
Peace!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-06-13 18:14:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
One question at a time! And please, write them in a way that makes sense!
2007-06-13 18:19:44 · answer #1 · answered by Harry 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I was driving to the hospital I work at and the radio announcer gave news of the first plane hitting the tower, and I remember thinking it was a horrible aviation mishap. When I walked into the main lobby of the hospital, it was completely empty...and from down the hall, I could hear people crying. Thinking that there was a 'red alert' in progress (a hospital disaster code denoting numerous fatalities and chaos) I ran to the radiology department where I worked...and it too was empty, and I could still hear crying, so I followed the sounds of sobs to the reception area where everyone was huddled around the television set and that's when I saw the videos of the second plane hitting, and the newscaster announcing that a third plane had hit the pentagon, and a fourth had gone down in a field in Pennsylvania. Having absolutely no idea just how far reaching this attack was going to be, I can honestly say that I've never been so scared in all my life...or as sad. As Long As You're Up: Even though I'm not the one who gave you the TD...your 20/20 hindsight and Monday morning quarterbacking is thoroughly unimpressive...I'm just sayin...
2016-05-19 23:34:25 · answer #2 · answered by shelli 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tower 7 had a big gash in it. A really tall building is much more prone to collapsing than a small building. It's physics. Try playing Jenga..
anthrax terrorist? I was sure it was xtian/neo-con extremists using 9-11 as an opportunity. If you look at their targets, it suggests just that although the news hushed down because Bush was trying to use that as an opportunity to blame Iraq or name drop Iraq.
2007-06-13 18:41:08 · answer #3 · answered by Lisaa 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The second Tower fell first because (of) the angle the plane hit the building was more devastating to the structure than the first. It also hit the building on lower floors which meant more weight was pressing down on those damaged floors.
2007-06-13 19:13:35 · answer #4 · answered by harryb 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
From what I understand, the second tower fell first because the aircraft hit the building in a better spot, causing the jet fuel to spread out more across those floors. Also, it hit lower than the first airplane and therefore the structural damage had to hold up more building than the first tower.
2007-06-13 18:20:54 · answer #5 · answered by PRC SD 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
explain this to me... if there is so much evidence that says The worlds biggest idiot President Bush and his gang of "Incompetents" wait.. or is it Evil Mastermind Bush and the Neocon WorldDomination front?? if there is so much evidence then why isnt this on the front page of the rocky mountain news? the newyorktimes? the bostonglobe? the BBC? any antibush liberal publication? let alone.... exposed by any anti bush or anti american leader..... amahdinahjad? anybody outside the US? why dont they come out with this ENORMOUS amount of evidence and get the president impeached.... why wasnt it in the 911 report? do the NEOCONS control the world..... is a necon making me write this right now at gun point? where are the NEOCON bush Gustapo that prevents you and your gang of ignorant bloggers and "Filmmakers" to make all your allegations about Bush? i mean... if it were such a big cover up... anyone thats ever talked about it would be picked up the the "Bush Gustapo" and executed right? exposing their big bad secret? so your telling me that Bush and his "Gang" can pull this off as a premise for war...but then go into Iraq and not create fake intel that said that they had WMDs... let alone plant them... i mean.. if the NEOCONS can fool the world about 911... they can certainly make phony documents saying "Yes... Saddamn not only had WMDS... he had 3 nukes and and a plutonium ice cream parlor!!" i mean, use your common sense and stop believing all this conspiracy anti bush anti american big corporations big oil their all going to kill us world domination new world order crap... this is coming from somone who was young, and heard of it...and believed it and said... damn but this makes no sense... this is ridiculous.... this is a bunch of anti american paranoid wackos who thinks everyones out to get em.... if it were really a big cover up... little johnny boy in greensburg kansas wouldnt be the one "enlightening" the planet...... get back to reality people.
2007-06-13 19:21:29 · answer #6 · answered by Aldo G 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How in the world do conspirators justify the logic of mocking you for ignoring their .05 percent of "evidence" while they ignore the 99.95 percent of evidence that completely contradicts their insane theories????????????
It falls along the same logic of let's take Saddam Hussein at his word when he promises he has no wmds, even though he already used some on his own people, yet they demand absolute hardcore no doubt about it proof from a sitting US president.
I will never, thank goodness, understand a conspirators logic. Is it that it doesn't exist?
2007-06-13 19:02:40 · answer #7 · answered by cadisneygirl 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If the government did it , why would they make it look like a planned demolition?
Anthrax attacks were not related.
2007-06-13 20:11:02 · answer #8 · answered by Miss Kitty 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It was a scam by the government to start a war to improve the failing economy.
2007-06-14 05:58:15 · answer #9 · answered by kyeann 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, it would seem that 9-11 was an inside job.
also, why is there no footage of the actual plane that hit the pentagon?
How come the planes that hit the world trade centers vaporized, but the "hijackers" passports didn't?
Why are the world trade centers (1, 2, and 7) the only three steel towers to have ever collapsed due to fire?
2007-06-13 18:22:10 · answer #10 · answered by Just Mara 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
All right you got me - the conspiracy theorists are right. I did it - I brought down the WTC with a carelessly discarded cigarette butt and 4 tons of C4 I left lying about. Honestly it was an accident.
Now that I have admitted it can we get back to reality?
2007-06-13 19:19:35 · answer #11 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋