English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

30 answers

No, it doesn't constitute as a hat-trick.

For that you need to take 3 consecutive wickets with 3 consecutive deliveries.

2007-06-18 08:00:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No it can't be an hattrick that will become an 7 ball over means that wide/no is taken into count. simply to get hattrick scoreboard must remain the same it must not tick. In other way to say 3 wickets taken on the same score within the consecutive bowls by the same bowler.

2007-06-21 16:03:53 · answer #2 · answered by sathya 2 · 0 0

To become a hat trick, a bowler should claim 3 wickets in three consecutive deliveries. In this case since the bowler has not taken 3 wickets in 3 consecutive deliveries, it cannot be considered as hat trick

2007-06-14 17:09:32 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

No, the hat-rick means consecutive three wickets in consecutive three balls and if a bowler bowls a wide after taking two consecutive wickets,he loses the chance to get the hat-rick.Because we commonly say 'wide ball'.It means that it is a ball.Therefore the third ball has been bowled and the hat-rick chance has been lost.
Infact,I favour your mind.What a brilliant question you have asked.WONDERFUL!
-Thanks.

2007-06-17 20:32:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No it can't be consider a HATTRICK. 3 Consecutive balls to get wickets & then only the Hattrick can be recorded. Hence the Noball/Wide bowled in between this can't be consider.

2007-06-13 22:05:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes this is possible for ur question the answer is tht if the bowler gets two wickets in the alst two balls of his spell and if it was the 50th over he was bowling then the first ball which will be bowled by him in the next match at the start of his spell will be a hat trick ball.Sree Santh has a chance to get a hat trick in the next game on his spell's first ball.this happened in today's India Australia match..Plezzzzz vote as best answer if u feel sooo!!!!!! thanxxxxxxx

2016-05-19 23:10:48 · answer #6 · answered by felecia 3 · 0 0

No, the hat-rick means consecutive three wickets in consecutive three balls and if a bowler bowls a wide after taking two consecutive wickets,he loses the chance to get the hat-rick.Because we commonly say 'wide ball'.It means that it is a ball.Therefore the third ball has been bowled and the hat-rick chance has been lost.
Infact,I favour your mind.What a brilliant question you have asked.WONDERFUL!
-Thanks.

2007-06-13 21:04:37 · answer #7 · answered by ricky 2 · 0 0

No
As a hat trick is 3 ball in a row. If it the end of bowlers bowl he can take a wicket the next ball.


but having a no ball inbetween mean it not a hat trick.

2007-06-13 17:59:05 · answer #8 · answered by jobees 6 · 0 0

sorry its only count as pair no hattrick
better luck next time
three balls in a row
mean three wickets in consecutive deliveries
when bowler bowls a ball it counts as ball
if it goes as wide or no ball
then it not count as ball
but look runs are still coming from that ball which goes no ball
or counted as wide.

so better luck next time.

2007-06-13 18:37:59 · answer #9 · answered by Shane 4 · 0 0

Three wickets in three balls no excuses but it can be two wickets in last two balls of the over and one more wicket in the first ball he bowls in his next over.

2007-06-16 19:51:03 · answer #10 · answered by SRK'S KNIGHT RIDERS 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers