have his face put on Mt Rushmore?
2007-06-13 13:27:26 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
YES~
him and Regan Both~
2007-06-13 14:31:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The question is really moot... or theoretical at best.
In 1937, a bill is introduced in Congress to carve a head of Susan B. Anthony on Rushmore. However, a rider on an appropriation bill required that money be spent only on those figures already begun, thus ending the Anthony proposal and all other possible additions to the monument. On October 31, 1941 was the last official day of carving.
Now... as for a NEW monument... hmmmm... isn't that what we have "Presidential Libraries" for?
2007-06-13 21:49:18 · answer #2 · answered by wyomugs 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I think we should just leave Mt. Rushmore alone.
2007-06-13 20:30:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, but he should have his face put on a dangerous volcano. That way we can always be reminded of the disaster that is the Bush Administration.
2007-06-13 20:31:41 · answer #4 · answered by ck4829 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He should have his face crammed up the azz of an old worn out jackass that suffers from anal leakage!
2007-06-13 20:30:26 · answer #5 · answered by bender_xr217 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
For sure, along with Reagan
2007-06-13 20:30:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-06-13 20:29:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
no thats history let it be part of american heritage, but GW my dude
2007-06-13 20:31:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
absolutely not, unless they can craft a rock dunce cap
2007-06-13 20:30:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
heck no - he has not done anything that makes him as deserving as the men already engraved there
2007-06-13 20:30:31 · answer #10 · answered by hope2help 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋