Does anyone know how mini stem IVF works?

Question

How much would it REALLY cost? What will I be going through if I chose this option? What doctors actually perform mini stem IVF? Feel free to add any info you have on this.

~ Thanks so much! ~

Answer 1

I think you are referring to Mini Stim IVF. Minimal Stimulation InVitro Fertilization. The cost, on average, is a thousand or so less then traditional IVF. Traditional IVF is about 12,000 so 10-11,000 for mini stim. Basically with mini stim the patient just takes less drugs--often clomid in combo with 1 or 2 injectables. This is where the lower cost comes in--fewer injectables means lower cost. But, you also get fewer follicles which in turn means lower success rate. If you are intrested in this method if IVF you would benefit to ask your local IVF clinic if they know of any trials going on for mini stim ivf--you will get it much cheaper!

Answer 2

Stem cells are alive however not more than your epidermis cells are or liver cells or micro organism within the water. You would not feel two times approximately killing a few micro organism so whats fallacious with utilising stem cells to upgrade the lives of truly persons? As for IVF - one hundred eggs wasted to make a million child is higher than one hundred eggs wasted. EDIT: Ok substitute epidermis cells with sperm mobile or unfertilised egg. Those have the expertise to come to be a human - my factor stays legitimate. They are simply cells. Most persons (and Animals and Plants) who would have existed however by no means is some distance bigger than individuals who have existed. The possibilities of you being born are so so so small it's like successful the lottery a number of instances in a row. Imagine one more sperm out of your dad entered your mums egg nine months earlier than you have been born, you would not exist. If you do the equal for each your mother and father, the possibilities that they have been born to create you is lovely fortunate as good, and also you would keep that for all of your ancestors over all existence for billions of years. I have no idea should you see the relevance to this factor but when I have not been transparent then i'm going to achieve this now - ninety nine.999% of all sperm and eggs do not broaden. A enormous percentage of embryos do not broaden. It is not a individual - this is a mobile. It does have the hazard to come to be a individual however so do your entire eggs and I wager you do not attempt to get pregnant each month? And even then with hundreds of thousands of sperm from a person, and billions of guys your going to ought to come to a decision which a million of the trillions and trillions of feasible persons you would create must be created. A built fetus is particular, a child is particular, a human is particular - a mobile is not! EDIT two: I wasn't implying you have been an fool, I simply did not recognize if I made my factor transparent. I bet that is an field wherein we disagree. I do not feel it's any further immoral than preventing an egg having the hazard to divide which each lady does through now not seeking to get pregnant whilst they may be able to (and the male similar to restrict any sexism claims through persons), however I too can see your factor.