Barney you have a brain. And honestly that scares me to death!
But please, BTW me and you- aren't you.....Mmmm ....a little lying! Just a little bit!!!!
Didn't you over-emphasize George's ability to choose? Weren't you and I silent when the empire builders were sketching facts of geography? Didn't we serve at their pleasure? OMG... I am thinking. Sorry I can get sooo sentimental. It is just that Karl hasn't given me his pep talk recently. I need that.
2007-06-13 12:50:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh boy, here we go again.
I have lost all patience with Libs. They never learn from history, even when the lesson is overwhelmingly obvious.
Back in the '80s when ignorant Libs were trying to denigrate Reagan with the term "Raygun", they were mocking his SDI program, a missile shield. Well, now we are trying to deploy a missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic, so obviously Reagan's dream is becoming a reality. Secondly, that SDI program is what made the Russians admit defeat in the Cold War. They simply could not compete economically with us. As Margaret Thatcher observed, "Reagan won the Cold War without firing a shot".
So you, as a Lib, read that quote. You know that Reagan's goal was to defeat the USSR and he succeeded in the most amazing way possible: without any bloodshed whatsoever. And yet you still use that tired old nickname to try and denigrate him? What is wrong with the Liberal brain? Reagan saved the world from the scourge of Russian Communism, immediately freeing all the nations of Middle and Eastern Europe, including the Czech Republic where I have chosen to live.
Now, regarding the "terrorists" Reagan armed. If you are trying to free your country from Communist slave masters, you are a freedom fighter. Reagan was arming people who wanted to retake their own country back from the Communist invaders. This is completely different than the situation in Iraq. The armed resistance there is defying the democratically elected government there, not a Communist puppet government. Therefore, they are rightly called "insurgents": they are fighting the lawful government fairly elected by the people.
Communism is nothing more than slavery of the masses by the Communist Party boss elites. Russia's terrible defeat in Afghanistan was supposedly much more traumatic than our experience in Vietnam. Russian soldiers in Afghanistan were taking turns shooting each other in the foot or leg just to be sent home. Domestic support in Russia for involvement in Afghanistan plummeted, and this was the first nail in the USSR's dream of constant expansion. You may forget that the USSR wanted to dominate the entire planet. Before Reagan entered office, they were gobbling up countries from Africa to Central America. Many European countries were already Socialist and the conversion to Communism would have been relatively easy. Reagan changed all that.
Maybe now you can post something nice about President Reagan.
2007-06-13 19:51:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Even Rex was annoyed by Ronald Reagan and his plastic, sappy speeches....he didn't want anything to doe with that old as the hills fart.
2007-06-13 19:34:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by AB17 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Reagan didn't remember to let Rex out of the basement as he was too busy setting up illegal arm deals with the Contras.
2007-06-13 19:36:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Where was Buddy while Slick Willy was committing genocide against Serbia? Where was Mr. Peanut while Jimmah was supporting the radical Islamic takeover of Iran? Would Bush get off so easily doing what they did?
2007-06-13 19:36:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why does Rex hate America?
2007-06-13 19:31:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by shelly 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dog like loyalty to a bad leader.
2007-06-13 19:32:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
simpleton! study history instead of some proganda revisionist blog garbage.
2007-06-13 19:33:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by T J 1
·
0⤊
3⤋