The kings of England also called themselves "King of France" from Henry V (died 1422) until Charles II agreed to stop using the title in a treaty with his cousin Louis XIV when he was restored to the throne in 1660. That's why you'll see Elizabeth I referred to as "Queen of England, Ireland, and France" even though she never set foot in France (and beheaded her cousin Mary of Scotland who really had been Queen of France).
Also, the English king had once ruled more of France than teh French King did, but starting with the terrible King John in the 13th century they lost most of their possessions there. During the hundred years war, they lost almost all of what was remaining except for the port of Calais and parts of Brittany.
And after the Hundred Years War Britain and France hated each other for centuries. And until the 1970s, anybody born in Scotland or in France was automatically a citizen in the other country as well due to alliances formed then.
There were many other major effects of course.
2007-06-13 10:54:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jonathan D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
one that's no longer often suggested is how after the conflict replaced into over it took time for some components of France to conform with French rule. after all a number of those lands have been residing decrease than English occupation for some years, as a effect some observed themselves as voters of britain extremely than France. in case you have no concept what i'm speaking approximately, you may see that for the period of this time England conquered a extensive part of mainland France which they could occupy for a protracted time (Hundred Years conflict). of direction by the tip of the conflict France had taken it back.
2016-10-17 04:18:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Effects of the war, right?
Knights are no longer the topdog as the longbowmen can slaugther a wave of knights, they will be soon replaced by cannons and guns. And the war made France a powerful state.
2007-06-13 14:24:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by this is madness!!! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
"The war also stimulated nationalistic sentiment. It devastated France as a land, but it also awakened French nationalism. The Hundred Years' War accelerated the process of transforming France from a feudal monarchy to a centralised state. The conflict became one of not just English and French kings but one between the English and French peoples. There were constant rumours in England that the French meant to invade and destroy the English language. National feeling emerged out of such rumours that unified both France and England further."
"The latter stages of the war saw the emergence of the dukes of Burgundy as important players on the political field, and it encouraged the English, in response to the seesawing alliance of the southern Netherlands (now Belgium, a rich centre of woolen production at the time) throughout the conflict, to develop their own woolen industry and foreign markets."
"A number of new weapons were introduced during the Hundred Years' War as well. Gunpowder, firearms and cannons played significant roles as early as 1375. The last battle of the war, the Battle of Castillon, was the first battle in European history in which artillery was the deciding factor."
"The consequences of these new weapons meant that the nobility was no longer the deciding factor in battle; peasants armed with longbows or firearms could gain access to the power, rewards, and prestige once reserved only for knights who bore arms. The composition of armies changed, from feudal lords who might or might not show up when called by their lord, to paid mercenaries. By the end of the war, both France and England were able to raise enough money through taxation to create standing armies, the first time since the fall of the Western Roman Empire that there were standing armies in Western or Central Europe. Standing armies represented an entirely new form of power for kings. Not only could they defend their kingdoms from invaders, but standing armies could also protect the king from internal threats and also keep the population in check. It was a major step in the early developments towards centralised nation-states that eroded the medieval order."
"In France during the captivity of King John II, the Estates General attempted to arrogate power from the king. The Estates General was a body of representatives from the three groups who traditionally had consultative rights in France: the clergy, the nobles, and the townspeople. First called together under Philip IV “the Fair”, the Estates had the right to confirm or disagree with the “levée”, the principal tax by which the kings of France raised money. Under the leadership of a merchant named Etienne Marcel, the Estates General attempted to force the monarchy to accept a sort of agreement called the Great Ordinance. Like the English Magna Carta, the Great Ordinance held that the Estates should supervise the collection and spending of the levy, meet at regular intervals independent of the king’s call, exercise certain judicial powers, and generally play a greater role in government. The nobles took this power to excess, however, causing in 1358 a peasant rebellion known as the Jacquerie. Swarms of peasants furious over the nobles’ high taxes and forced-labour policies killed and burned in the north of France. One of their victims proved to be Etienne Marcel, and without his leadership the Estates General divided."
"The effects of the Hundred Years’ War in England also raised some questions about the extent of royal authority. Like the French, the English experienced a serious rebellion against the king during a gap in the succession caused by the death of Edward III when his grandson had not yet reached maturity. Called the Peasants' Revolt and also Wat Tyler’s Rebellion, the 1381 uprising threatened saw some 100,000 peasants march on London to protest the payment of high war taxes and efforts by the nobility to reduce English peasants to serfdom. The mob murdered and burned the houses of government officials and tax collectors. The young king-to-be, Richard II, met the peasants outside his castle, defusing their violence by promising to meet their demands. At the same time, agents of the throne murdered Wat Tyler, a key leader of the revolt, and Richard II sent the peasants back to their homes in the countryside. After they left, however, he reneged on his promises and kept taxes high."
"Hundred Years' War : Significance" : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_year_war#Significance
2007-06-13 10:56:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erik Van Thienen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
By the end of the first one they forget what they were fighting for so they started all over again! :D
2007-06-13 10:50:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sam Y 3
·
0⤊
1⤋