English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113211/ has an article on it. I was just wondering what everyones thoughts were on it. I think that in theory it is a good idea because there are too many dogs that don't have homes and will be put down- it is super sad. But I don't think that this will work....how would they ever enforce it

2007-06-13 08:06:05 · 14 answers · asked by like the ocean needs the waves 4 in Pets Other - Pets

14 answers

I think it would be a great law. Due to the homeless pet problem, I think it would be wonderful if laws were passed in all states that require the spaying/neutering of all companion animals. (Plus, I believe that we should work towards "phasing out" domestics, as domestics came about via artificial selection rather than natural selection.)

I agree that it would be difficult to enforce, but there are any number of steps that could be taken:
1) The law could require that all shelters, rescues, humane societies, etc... spay/neuter prior to adoption or require adopters to sign a contract agreeing to spay/neuter within a given time limit.
2) Require that all veterinarians report customers who have not had their companion animals spayed/neutered.
3) Include breeders in the law- Outlaw breeding.
4) Set up government funded spay/neuter clinics and programs for the financially disadvantaged.
5) Require that all shelters, rescues, humane societies, etc... submit their adoption records to law enforcement and then require that those people submit proof of spay/neuter within a given time limit.
6) Impose heavy fines on those who do not obey spay/neuter laws.

2007-06-14 06:33:02 · answer #1 · answered by SINDY 7 · 2 0

First, 4 months isn't too youthful to spay/neuter. in fact, thinking i understand of particularly some shelters that spay/neuter at 8-10 weeks, 4 months is a robust age. 2nd, anybody with a puppy could have sufficient funds spay/neuter. There are low value clinics in each and every area which will do loose or very inexpensive spay/neuter ($30-50). third, i'm soooo chuffed that the government is stepping in to help the animals. this could nicely be a extensive step for animal rights. the only difficulty I even have is they in all probability won't enforce the regulation. So we could desire to continually have exterior breeders, yet a minimum of they are going to now be unlawful, so we don't have maximum of animals to eutahnize in shelters. As somebody that has worked in animal rights, and in easily animal shelters, i've got faith that this legislations is shifting interior the dazzling direction, notwithstanding it could choose some tweaking.

2016-10-07 10:55:49 · answer #2 · answered by elzey 4 · 0 0

Check out Petfinder.com to see how many pets need homes right now. The last time that I checked it was close to 230,000!
If this law passes it will help(not solve) the problem of pet overpopulation by forcing people to think before they take on the responsibility if having a pet. I'm not saying that this bill is fool proof but it IS a step in the right direction!
I think that all of America should have this law in place.

2007-06-13 08:23:07 · answer #3 · answered by Eva 4 · 3 0

Sounds like a great idea, but it would, to a degree, be hard to enforce. Vets could be required to have their animal altered in order to get treatment. Kennels and other areas could be forced to only allow altered animals. Imagine if you went to a petstore with an intact male and an officer was there that required you to show paperwork saying you are a legal breeder or you get a $500 fine.

In short, sounds great and all of america should do that!

2007-06-13 08:13:40 · answer #4 · answered by Case n Cali 2 · 1 0

I think it is a great idea. It would be hard to enforce, but people have to realize that they are responsible for there pets. Most people have no idea what a problem the pet population is... maybe a law like this will help educate people.

2007-06-13 08:10:06 · answer #5 · answered by Kamunyak 5 · 1 0

I'm not sure how they would enforce it but it is a good concept. Spaying and neutering is a win-win situation all the way around. In regards to the pets health, it is always better. In regards to overpopulation and unwanted pets crowding our local humane societies, it is always better.

2007-06-13 08:40:20 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

California is the front runner on all kinds of things. It should be required, that is unless someone is going to breed them, and then, they should have to pay a good sum of money for this.

It is sad to see the number of dogs and cats that have to be put down because of thoughtless pet owners.

2007-06-13 08:10:44 · answer #7 · answered by NickFlorida 2 · 3 0

It is a good idea because this will mean that any one who has a pet or buys one will have to get it spayed/neutered whether they want to or not because it is the law.

2007-06-13 08:10:52 · answer #8 · answered by dawn_myhamsters 2 · 2 0

Wow...that's smart. Now people HAVE TO rescue to get a dog. But two problems...some people who have dogs are poor and can't afford it and there are soo many dogs making enforcing it would be almost impossible unless you have 5,000 people on the job.

2007-06-13 09:51:52 · answer #9 · answered by ~lil~miss~Z~ 2 · 1 0

Another law that sounds great to someone sitting at a desk with no real relation to carrying out the law.

2007-06-13 08:10:06 · answer #10 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers