That takes me back. Can't remember. Good luck, you'll figure it out.
2007-06-13 06:56:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you explain to us what you just said? How can the horizontal line y=5 have a limit of 2? What does that have to do with f(x)?
Lim x->2 f(x) =5 means that as the values of x gets very close to 2, f(x) gets very close to 5.
2007-06-13 16:25:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Someone Angry 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lim x->2 f(x) = 5; It means that as x approaches to the value "2" , the function f(x)approaches to a value of "5".
I think ur logic gets stuck if line, y =5, cuts or touches the function f(x) more than once.
2007-06-13 07:05:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by 1dost 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the the function is continuous and constant,
the lim x-> a is 5 for all values of a including x - >2
2007-06-17 06:46:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by gfulton57 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In words this reads "As x-->2 , f(x)-->5."
Now y = 5 is a horizontal line that passes thro` (0,5)
So what we are now saying is that as x--> 2, f(x) approaches the line y = 5.
Line y = 5 is a horizontal asymptote.
f(x) may approach y = 5 from above or below the line.
2007-06-13 07:15:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Como 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it means that if you look at the graph y = f(x), when x gets very close to 2, y gets very close to 5. when x=2, y may not be equal to 5 or it may even be undefined. but when x is near 2, y is near 5.
2007-06-13 07:04:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
f(a million) = 3 - ?(7) = approximately .3542 f(2) = approximately 20.sixty 8 for this reason the intermediate value theorem won't be able to be used. IVT demands a non-end equation, and it is. even regardless of the undeniable fact that a non-end equation could be drawn easily, and if we drew a line from .3542 to 20.sixty 8, it won't bypass in the time of the x axis. for this reason ivt gets you nowhere
2016-10-09 03:19:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by tuberman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋