2007-06-13 06:04:49 · 11 answers · asked by George 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bring Em On - whatever your intentions, your answer is funny
2007-06-13 06:11:42 · update #1
Sorry, the moola's not there no more.
2007-06-13 06:09:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is an interesting question and proposal but maybe there should be also a 'bonus' to a president who performs well beyond the election promises and public expectations! Let us corporatize the presidency!
By the way, if the money back guarantee scheme is applied with retrospective effect to the current president, what should be his liability to a nation that is bleeding?
2007-06-13 13:12:23 · answer #2 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah, the wonders of Consumer America... nobody wants it unless it comes in installments of $19.95 with a money-back guarantee.
2007-06-13 13:13:38 · answer #3 · answered by K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, the Red Chinese certainly got their money's worth from Clinton. Bush was already rich, so he didn't sell out. He just has a gift for screwing up.
2007-06-13 13:08:27 · answer #4 · answered by Yesugi 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and it should be longer than 30 days.
2007-06-13 13:12:07 · answer #5 · answered by jebul 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would be happy if they would just stop taking more.
Let's make that deal for all politicians.
2007-06-13 14:05:08 · answer #6 · answered by Richard F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like the pottery barn scheme myself: You break it your bought it.
You elect them, you get them for four years.
Think when you vote.
2007-06-13 13:15:17 · answer #7 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I could have retired after Jimmie carter was tossed out of office.
2007-06-13 13:07:46 · answer #8 · answered by TedEx 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, it should come with a dumb decision guarantee. If we don't like him, we can reverse all his stupid decisions.
2007-06-13 13:10:20 · answer #9 · answered by alee522 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but there should be a Recall provision.
2007-06-13 13:08:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋