PETA is a huge supporter of the democrats and would love free universal health coverage for animals . Do you think this is a wise idea? Should Americans be paying for cats to get spayed? Will this cause a increase in illegal Mexican animal immigrants seeking free health care? If a person in Tijuana has a dog that breaks it's leg, they probably would take it to San Diego to get it fixed for free, right? I think this idea is just too much of a burden on the taxpayer.
2007-06-13 05:55:04 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
hich, a link to what? that PETA would love UHC for animals? I think that is an obvious fact
2007-06-13 05:58:27 · update #1
hichefheidi, i asked the question of whether her plan would include that and if it is a wise idea. notice the question part, it wasn't a statement that it will happen. you know what a question mark is, don't you?
2007-06-13 06:01:16 · update #2
I sure hope so..If you have seen the way some of these kids act these days they may not be able to classify them as human lol
2007-06-13 06:02:23 · answer #1 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What will happen is the corrupt insurance industry will develop a cheap, nearly useless insurance policy that everyone can buy to meet the requirement, and we will still be no better off. All that will happen is that health care costs will rise to meet the new artificially higher demand created by this junk insurance and people with good insurance will still be paying to offset the costs of those with crappy insurance. All the while, Clinton or Obama (either one) will be able to claim they provided health care for everyone (in reality, we already have that as hospitals aren't allowed to turn away those that need life sustaining care). Further mandating electronic files is ridiculous to boot. One, I don't want the government to have access to my health records, and secondly, if a hospital isn't leaning out its processes and going paperless, someone should open a paperless hospital across the street and put them out of business. Free markets do work...if you can get the government to quit tinkering with them distorting the true market forces. Government isn't the solution to the problem; it is the problem. Ron Paul in '08
2016-05-19 02:03:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Note that Hillary and the Dems plan is labeled UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE. Not, national health care. We certainly will end up paying for illegals already here and since Mexico is part of the 'universe' we will have to include them and then we will have to join with all the other Socialist countries. All these funds will go into one pot and the U.S. will carry 90% of the load.
2007-06-13 06:01:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The only problem will come when pet health insurance rates climb to levels that average income earners can no longer afford .Some policy's even pay for lethal injections . Try to get that in your policy and watch your rates drop .
2007-06-13 06:08:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you serious? Your worried about f*cking animals? With all the people without health insurance. Mexican animal immigrants? I don't think Mexicans will be hopping the border just so their animals will get health care. What an asinine question.
2007-06-13 06:08:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, peta does NOT support democrats. They support the radical radical left.
Trust me - I was a member for 6 years.
They dont have ANY campaigns about having health care for animals.
In fact, they dont even believe that humans should own animals at all.
So check your facts before spouting them off wrong. You have no idea what youre talking about.
2007-06-13 06:00:14 · answer #6 · answered by spamber 1 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Do us all a favor. Go back and re-read your question and look at it objectively, then let me know what you would think of someone who posted something like that.
The reason I say this is because for some reason, with any topic (sex, marriage, and now apparently healthcare), the neocon extremist's mind seems to jump from "humans" to "animals," as though they are equally important in the political spectrum.
They are not. No one has claimed they are.
2007-06-13 05:58:35 · answer #7 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Women like Hillary do tend to support other dogs.
2007-06-13 18:03:49 · answer #8 · answered by BRICK 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Matt, honey, I have yet to see the blueprint, as have you. However, having worked for the state and federal government and receiving health care benefits from the state for years (which in essence the closest one can get to universal benefits) I would say no.
Do you have a Freudian obsession with animals?? Do you need to talk about it??
2007-06-13 05:59:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
If she can come up with a way for those animals to cast votes, she will give them free healthcare!
2007-06-13 05:58:05 · answer #10 · answered by vincefoster 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋