2007-06-13 05:11:26 · 14 answers · asked by AZN_4_EVA 4 in Sports ➔ Basketball
I agree, Daniel Gibson got fouled on a three, and LEbron James was fouled on the last shot, He was fouled in the act of shooting, because when Bruce Bowen fouled him he immediately rose up, he only shot that because he felt the contact and he shouldve gotten three free throws, the third foul called on LeBron James was also unfair, as he barely touched Bruce Bowen, but I really beleive the Cavs can win the next 4 if they start hitting shots, and play defense like they did yesterday
2007-06-13 05:28:46 · answer #1 · answered by gopistons 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually it is only you. Throughout the fourth quarter THE SPURS gave the Cavs every opportunity to show them they were a championship caliber team...with under 3 minutes to go in da game Lebron misses two lay ups...Daniel Gibson misses a wide open look for three and the rest is history. You couldnt ask for a better set up for da cavs, at home with a chance to win with a minute to go...and who shoot??? Anderson??? COME ON! If the Cavs want to become one of the elite teams, there going to have to start learning how to finish halfs (i.e the 10 point run THE SPURS put on them to close the 1st half) its just not enough to say you gave yourself a chance at the end of the game. As for the play at the end of the game, you cant blame THE SPURS! im a spur fan (as if you didnt know) i personally felt he should have shot 3, but the events that lead up to that moment are what difined the game...not those 2 seconds!
2007-06-13 06:56:13 · answer #2 · answered by jussogood 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No the Cavs beat the Spurs in almost every statistical category but couldn't keep them from taking and keeping the lead. As a basketball player leaving the game for the refs to f**k up is like hoping a judge in boxing will swing the in your favor. Sometimes u get what u want, most of the time......NOT. The Cavs lost that game by not playing hard, not playin like they were down 0-2 in the series. No sense of urgency to get a win.
2007-06-13 05:18:16 · answer #3 · answered by Dee 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, it's not just you who thinks that. It's you and anyone who doesn't want the spurst to win. Some wrongs calls went BOTH ways! But in the end, the refs didn't win. The Spurs did! If the Spurs had made all their free throws, they'd won by 10, and if the Cavs had made their free throws, they would have won by one!
2007-06-13 06:33:59 · answer #4 · answered by CGlez 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's just you. The ref's gave the cav's a chance to tie by not calling the foul. It was before the shot. Lebron wouldn't even have gotten any free throws because the Spurs had a foul to give. Oh yeah and the Ca'v blew and 8 point lead with a minute to go in the first half. That's why they lost.
2007-06-13 05:16:03 · answer #5 · answered by Brock Samson 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Refs have missed calls and made phantom calls in every game since who knows when. The refs did there job whether we like it or not. The Cavs didn't do there's. The Spurs missed like....what 10 + shots down the stretch. Cavs needed to capitalize on that and they did NOT! Stop looking for a scape goat.....the Cavs lost...they didn't need the refs to do that for them.
2007-06-13 05:57:47 · answer #6 · answered by bfavre4gb 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If you're talking about that last play. After the game, Lebron called it incidental contact. It wouldn't have mattered anyway because he wasn't shooting when Bowen touched him. And the refs missed at least 3 calls against the Spurs earlier in the game, which no one is complaining about. Anything else?
2007-06-13 05:17:41 · answer #7 · answered by Alice K 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Nah, i was pretty pissed when they called that 3rd foul on Duncan....He barely even touched Z, and they called a pushing fould..what kinda crap was that? Cavs lost the game, the Refs didnt! Dont Blame anyone but the cavs because the refs blew multiple calls on both sides of the floor!
2007-06-13 05:40:43 · answer #8 · answered by 2ManyQuestions 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This was a terrible game to watch...I mean that was a Finals game? Both teams played terrible and the Cav's had ample opprtunities to win...BUT James last shot (the three point shot with like 3 secs left) he was clearly fouled, and he should have shot 3 Free throws...So there is at least a chance they could have tied the game and taken it into overtime which would have at least make the game fun to watch.
2007-06-13 05:23:26 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. G 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is only you. Daniel Gibson shooting 10% from the field, Sasha Pavlovic shooting 33% from the field, Lebron James missing easy layups at the end of the game is why the Cavs lost.
2007-06-13 05:15:33 · answer #10 · answered by CoolHand 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋