Nato forces had intercepted weapons from Iran heading to Afghanistan. Is it me or is this just a but suspicious?
I have believed for a long time Iran was helping the insurgency, i say CRUSH THEM!!!! If we crush Iran then the Taliban loses one of its weapons providers and therefore is in trouble.
Do you support that in light of this evidence a invasion of Iran on the grounds of violation of international law and for the murder of many U.S soldiers.
2007-06-13 04:51:44 · 5 answers · asked by Proud Michigander 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A number of good answers.
Certainly room for debate.
I do agree it seems fishy of Iran to Help the Taliban who are Sunni and they are Shiite Fundamentalists. However not all terrorists are Sunni and there are some Shiite Terror groups other then the Taliban that are killing U.S soldiers. I think it possible Iran is directly involved with attacking the U.S by sending weapons to the insurgents. I am going to let there be a vote to decide the answer and i am going to see what the popular opinion is Regarding Iran.
2007-06-14 10:28:32 · update #1
Please show me any evidence of this! At one point in the 90's Iran almost went to war with the talibans for killing a bunch of Iranian diplomats. Now tell my why iran want to help Talibans! and why would iranians want to support Americas number one enemy that is just stupid!
2007-06-13 19:17:16 · answer #1 · answered by w s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no longer any way to deny that Iran is helping the insurgents in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan. I would consider this an act of war on the part of the Iranians. I do not think, however, that we need to attack Iran just yet. They will soon officially join in the war in Iraq.
2007-06-13 11:58:13 · answer #2 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes i have been thinking that this kind of intervention has been necessary for quite some time and this evidence should be more than enough for a UN sanction against Iran. The thing is though, it most likely wont happen. Either efficiently or correctly. The people in charge are going to be too worried about how their image is going to be spun in the Washington Post or on CNN the next day. These self-absorbed men and women are going to place a block on what needs to be done in order for a more favorable political outcome.
**edited for grammatical error**
2007-06-13 12:32:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That probably is a very logical step. But still reeling and trying to find an escape route from Iraq, our decision-makers are kind of hesitant.
2007-06-13 11:56:17 · answer #4 · answered by ramshi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
na,
invading iran would be a bad idea.... we should just bomb em...
we´re good at that... but yeah, i agree.... i think a lot of people owe bush a HUGE apology..
i wonder if anyone still believes they´re going after nuclear power for peace...
i think, john mccain summed it up best with that beach-boys song...
bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb iran
2007-06-13 12:00:04 · answer #5 · answered by James R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋