English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's funny to know that Dems always say that unions are important to them. Unions are truly one of the Dem party's most important supporters.

But, now unions are very upset that top Dems in Congress support illegals. The unions say that illegal immigrants drive down wages for working American families and their union members.

Who will the Dems in DC support? Their union buddies or the illegal immigrants? Will the unions continue to be angry?

I love to see Dems kiss up to everyone and then betray someone after getting elected. Don't you?

2007-06-13 04:26:31 · 4 answers · asked by tip zz 2 in Politics & Government Politics

4 answers

No, when they do their shopping they try to save a buck like the rest of us and buy things mostly made in China.

2007-06-13 04:29:50 · answer #1 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 2 0

If I recall a reading on this subject the Unions said they would be upset at the support of illegals, not that they are upset at the support of illegals. However unions are losing their steam daily as to compared to what they were like 20 years ago. I don't think Democrats have to pander as much to the unions as they did in the past. Not that any of this illegal stuff is right, just saying that Unions are really losing their steam.

2007-06-13 11:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by bs b 4 · 0 0

Thanks to the Unions that advocated for breaks and an eight hour day, vacation and sick time and child labor laws.

The Bush administration seems intent on getting an immigration policy passed which will pave the way for illegals to gain citizenship although many members of his party don't agree with it.

Politicians of both parties always do what is politically expedient rather than what they campaigned on.

2007-06-13 11:33:51 · answer #3 · answered by ken erestu 6 · 1 0

Are you happy that George W Bush is spearheading this movement to give anmesty?
I SAY BUY AMERICAN

George W Bush has even tried to outsource his responsibility of Commander in Chief by appointing a "WAR CZAR" geez didn't he declare himself the WAR PRESIDENT?

2007-06-13 11:33:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers