They blame him for everything else the wacky militant-extremist muslims go in the rest of the world so I find it curious that they haven't hit this yet. Maybe it's because Al Franken hasn't been on the air yet to tell them to connect these dots (since we all know libs only think about news in sound-bites).
2007-06-13 02:33:50 · 17 answers · asked by Jacques LeStrapp 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
as soon as Moveon.org gets approval from George Soro's to post the talking points....
2007-06-13 02:47:05 · answer #1 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well you can't say he hasn't his part of guilt in what is going on there...Of course he is not the only one...Allow me to remind you why those things happen in Gaza.Remember when Hamas was elected,this thing wasn't very happy for some of the countries that were screaming that the Palestinians must have democratic elections.So even though Hamas was democratically elected,they weren't the ones the western world was hoping to see winning...so they cut all funds,applying a collective punishment on the Palestinians and basically let them starve...And the rest you know...
2007-06-13 09:14:06 · answer #2 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What kind of engagement does this administration have in the peace process? By invading Iraq we've opened a war on two fronts. It's become more difficult to deal with. The blame game is all neo-cons have left, because they don't have any solutions for the mess they've created.
2007-06-13 02:59:09 · answer #3 · answered by Fern O 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Had Bush spent time and Money on the Israel issue instead of Iraq he may have made progress on peace. Bush decided to ignore that problem and occupy Iraq at a cost to working class tax payers of $2 trillion..
2007-06-13 02:54:44 · answer #4 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why haven't they blamed him...
they're too busy thinking and celebrating that..
the mid-term election that historically went exactly as
in the past...
.has validated and offered a mandate
that the Hitler-esque rants of Howard Dean's Party..that
are clearly illustrated by the liberties they take in trashing Joe Leiberman..
are the way to conduct themselves..and a path to power..over all.
2007-06-13 03:01:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, I'll get the ball rolling! It's Bush's fault!!!!! I'ts all his fault, if he had nuked the little snits in the first place they wouldn't be over there now trying to kill each other instead of the Jews! Damn him and his lack of action attitude! Impeach him now, before the sunni's and the shi'ites in Iraq start killing each other! Oh? It's too late for that too? Damn him again!
2007-06-13 02:45:14 · answer #6 · answered by booman17 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure we will find out what George Bush did to cause this at some point. Creative writing is often a slow process.
2007-06-13 02:37:21 · answer #7 · answered by Brian 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
And we know the cons think about news like Bill O'rielly, ignoring the deaths of our Brave American soldiers, put in harms way by a pack of lies spread buy the BUSH GANG.
GAZA HUH damn Bush
2007-06-13 02:42:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why did Bush cause all this trouble in Gaza?
Why did Bush kill Anna Nicole Smith?
Why did Bush cause me to drink so much that I threw up last night?
Damn you President Bush... DAMN YOU!!!
2007-06-13 02:40:51 · answer #9 · answered by brooks b 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure it's coming...He is responsible for EVERY bad thing thats ever happened...even when he WASN'T President yet...or at least that is what you would think if you listened to them.
2007-06-13 02:43:23 · answer #10 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋