English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

Because it's not their normal, so therefore it's wrong to them. Much like how each culture view Jesus as a different color... People make Jesus into what they want him to be, not the truth of who he really was. But that's because of the Bible and the changes it always seems to take on... :)

However I've never seen anything to support your statement in the Bible. So if you could please show your facts to support your statement. As I'm sure it would help us all out, as no one else seems to be able to support your question.

2007-06-13 02:35:13 · answer #1 · answered by Jyse 6 · 5 1

I have never seen verses that show any indication of Bi or gay behavior. I think it bothers Christians when people say that b/c the Bible makes no mention of it, no reference of it, and it is a whole unfounded comment. If you are going to make a blanket comment like that about the largest world religion, I would start showing proof.

Kissing didn't mean making out, it is not different than le bisou so it if that is your argument, you need some leasons in translantion of history to modern culture, that is like saying that all men were gay though history b/c they lotioned and oiled their bodies to keep clean, or they were cross dressers b/c they wore wigs.

2007-06-13 09:56:42 · answer #2 · answered by carrie_penny 3 · 0 0

I'm not sure what book of the Bible that's in but I'm sure people interpret the Bible many different ways. I have heard Jesus was a dark skinned man also.

2007-06-14 10:15:18 · answer #3 · answered by Amy B 2 · 0 0

I don't know. People are weird, they don't think outside of the box at all! They think all of the answers to this world are actually in one small book! Its ridiculous! Jesus actually didn't even want us to worship him can you believe that? Also I think Jesus was here on earth to teach us humans (which he was too) what we could do, which is to be just like him! Might sound weird but Ive read some pretty awesome books on this subject and they make a whole lot more sense than the bible!

2007-06-13 09:35:10 · answer #4 · answered by Susy_Q 3 · 3 1

This can NOT be accurate. Jesus was a devout JEW, and the laws of his time would have had him stoned to death for having sex with a man. The law of the time was to get the tribe to increase in size, and same sex relationships produced no new members of the tribe. It is more likely that IF Jesus even existed at all that he was probably married as that was the Jewish law at the time - get married and have as many children as possible. I have no idea where you are getting your information, but your conclusion from the information is nowhere near historically accurate. Whether someone is gay or not is now known to be genetically determined, but for you to make this statement shows a big misunderstanding of the times in which Jesus supposedly lived.

2007-06-13 09:37:07 · answer #5 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 1 2

Paul, not Jesus, said in Christ there is no male or female. Jesus refers to the disciple John as beloved.

This is what I'm guessing you take to be the source of your claims which are more anachronistic than inaccurate.

In general, Jesus, because of his divinity, is treated as non-sexual - loving towards everyone. Christianity is unusual in this - it actually establishes a disconnect between religion and sex of any sort, or put more positively, suggests that God is more important than sex.

2007-06-13 13:11:54 · answer #6 · answered by Christopher H 2 · 1 0

I'd like to know what Bible you are reading! There is NO where that the Bible advocates bisexuality. Jesus was NOT bisexual and preached condemnation for ALL who practice Homosexuality~ ~Romans 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. ~~ Homosexuality is a SIN!!!

Jesus was, is and is to come the Perfect Father!! He had NO sin contained within Him...EVER!!

Your name speaks volumes!!

2007-06-13 09:54:50 · answer #7 · answered by heavenboundiwillbe 5 · 1 2

I don't remember that book of the Bible. Your evidence would be nice to see but let's assume you have some verses from the Bible which support your theory...

People would be bothered by that because a clear contradiction would be there and shake some people's faith.

2007-06-13 09:34:55 · answer #8 · answered by One Voice In The Day Rings True 5 · 1 1

Okay, I am NOT a Bible Thumper, nor a Christian, but I know the Bible pretty well from my Christian days, and I can't recall any passages that indicate he was gay and advocated bisexuality? Please expand...

2007-06-13 09:47:39 · answer #9 · answered by ☮ wickey wow wow ♀♀ 7 · 1 0

Where?

It bothers people because Of the Book of Genesis -- Adam and Eve.
And the fact that sex is made for procreation.
And that a man will take a wife and treat him carefully.

Bi or homosexuality does not allow for any of these.

Thats the catholic teaching.

I dont enforce it but understand that in the Catholic Faith...there are many rules with reasons that were scientifically viable before (surrogacy, contraception) and now sees any activity outside of marriage is adultery.

Please respect them. I'm sure you are all wonderful people, but so are they.

2007-06-13 09:36:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers