English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1) p is always less than or equal to minimum of x,y,z.
2)p is alwasys greater than or equal to maximum of x,y,z.
3) p is always greater than the minimum of x,y,z and less than the maximum of x,y,z.
4) none of these.

2007-06-13 02:30:35 · 5 answers · asked by Targeting C.A.T 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

5 answers

Try some examples you know and at least see if you can cancel out any possibilities.

3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2

This rules out 2 since p is NOT greater than 5. Choice 3 is also out since 2 is not between 3 and 5.

What about choice 1? Hmmm...

Fermat's Last Theorem:
If an integer n is greater than 2, then the equation a^n + b^n = c^n has no solutions in non-zero integers a, b, and c.

So IF x^p+y^p = z^p then either...
p = 2
x = 0
y = 0

Of course 0 isn't a natural number, so that leaves us with p=2. The smallest values of x,y and z that work are the ever-popular 3,4 and 5.

So x,y and z are ALWAYS greater than p. Choice 1.

2007-06-13 03:01:59 · answer #1 · answered by ryanker1 4 · 1 0

2

2007-06-13 02:40:45 · answer #2 · answered by Nik 2 · 0 1

i've got in no way been a non secular guy or woman. yet i've got been a honest one. I see faith for what it particularly is; i glance at it for the period of the 'eyes' of the Bible and comprehend that it falls in need of what Jesus taught. when I became a 'christian' I informed myself i could shop on with a faith that had no longer something to do with politics or conflict in any way. i could shop on with a faith that would not bow all the way down to idols and worship human saints. i could shop on with a faith that did no longer shop on with man made traditions and veiled pagan celebrations. till i detect that faith I stay as some distance faraway from church homes as I probable can. I examine God's word on my own, and attempt and to enforce what I examine in my on a daily basis existence.

2016-10-07 10:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Ans 1)

Pf: Let x be smallest and set

x^p = (z-y)(z^(p-1) + z^(p-2)*y +.....+z*y^(p-2) + y^(p-1) )

put x in formula and since x<=y and (z-y)>=1 we have

x^p >= 1( p*x^(p-1) ) . Dividing by x^(p-1) yields , x>=p.

2007-06-13 02:56:18 · answer #4 · answered by knashha 5 · 2 0

p<=2 so 4)none of these (Fermat´s last theorem)

2007-06-13 07:17:43 · answer #5 · answered by santmann2002 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers