English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

to make things more intresting the non-seller put down the down payment. the house has increased in value. they have only lived in the house for 2 years.

2007-06-13 02:28:51 · 5 answers · asked by westb51 1 in Business & Finance Renting & Real Estate

to make things more intresting the non-seller put down the down payment. the house has increased in value. they have only lived in the house for 2 years

should the non-seller pay for half of the apprasial

2007-06-13 02:40:07 · update #1

5 answers

This is simple. The house needs to be properly appraised at current market value. You now have a fair 'sale price'. Since each should share equally in any appreciation value, the seller should get half of the market value of the home, less the downpayment invested by the non-seller. This assumes, of course, that expenses to maintain the house after purchase were equally shared.

2007-06-13 02:34:54 · answer #1 · answered by acermill 7 · 0 0

I'd expect the seller to get the 1/2 the market value of the house after the down payment and monthy payments were subtracted.

2007-06-13 02:33:06 · answer #2 · answered by wizjp 7 · 0 0

The seller should expect fair market price for his interest in the house . Though the none seller put up down payment , if the parties both signed the mortgage the profit should be split minus the down payment money with interes.

2007-06-13 03:12:59 · answer #3 · answered by just had enough 1 · 0 0

An appraisal most be made. It's for the benefit of both, therefore the cost of the appraisal should be split equally.

2007-06-13 02:57:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

screwed

2007-06-13 02:37:00 · answer #5 · answered by lissie 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers