When France was refusing to back Geoge Bush's war of aggression (ie preemptive strike), people said many nasty things about France. It turns out France was correct in turning against Bush
2007-06-13 02:18:50 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
France wasn't the only one! But indeed, if you "badmouthed" the french people on this matter, I think a apology would be appropriate... Anyways, i hope the American people doesn't make the same mistake on their next election.
2007-06-13 02:25:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
WE? No "We" dont owe anyone an apology.
Neo Cons who rushed us into a war they have neither the intention of finishing nor prosecuting correctly, should spend the next 20 years (or until we pay down the NINE TRILLION National Debt Republicans have stuck us with) apologizing to the families of dead US soldiers, the families of dead Iraqi civilians killed in combat, the US and the rest of the world.
Then they all need to pack their bags, get on a ship such as the Titanic and go looking for icebergs. At night.
They can shout, "I'm the King of the World!" all they want though.
2007-06-13 09:34:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
we don't owe France crap, but Bush owes many people an apology.
he can start with the families that have suffered the losing family members to his lies, and then to the American tax payer, that will be paying for lies for the next several decades.
After that he can apologize to everyone else.
Sarkozy won because he embraced policies that usually are associated with liberal platforms.
btw he(Bush) was caught in a bold-faced lie on national tv about rummy, he even admitted he lied. for all you who claim you haven't seen one thing he lied about! if you would get your head out of the dirt and quit living in denial, you might have seen several lies.
2007-06-13 09:39:28 · answer #3 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yeah!
That man the republicans call president and swear up and down that he was elected, even went to the height of silliness by renaming French Fries and calling them Freedom Fries.
What in heck was he thinking?
Do fried potatos have anything to do with freedom?
.
2007-06-13 09:49:05 · answer #4 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
A large order of french fries sounds great right about now!
2007-06-13 09:24:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Lie ? Ya right. Here we go again. See... If you continue listening to a lie long enough, and you begin to believe in it.
2007-06-13 09:37:18 · answer #6 · answered by Robert S 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
France wasn't correct and Bush isn't a liar. I keep hearing that but haven't seen one thing he has lied about. If people would learn to listen when someone else speaks they may actually understand what is being said and not call the speaker a liar years later.
2007-06-13 09:22:48 · answer #7 · answered by Brian 7 · 4⤊ 10⤋
Riiiiight.
thats why Sarkozy won in a landslide...
Why whats that rumble? Its France shifting to the right.
2007-06-13 09:21:27 · answer #8 · answered by smitty031 5 · 4⤊ 6⤋
back it up.
France was in bed with Saddam, that's why they did not want to get involved. They wanted deals on oil.
I am guessing all the families that suffered under Saddam were wrong too? Saddam was justified in killing the innocents according to you?
Yea...take your zero research theories and keep them to yourself.
2007-06-13 09:39:39 · answer #9 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋
I still laugh thinking about colon powell lying before the united nations.
2007-06-13 09:21:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋