70mph speed limit?

Question

should the goverment put restrictions on car manufactures to make cars with speed ristricters on as most cars can go over 100mph. it not nesessary to go so fast so why buiold cars that go so fast

Answer 1

Good question and I agree that such a device would make a lot of sense. This could either be an automatic device fitted to the car with people having no say in the matter...or even a manual device that people could set......limiting the max speed a car could go at. In fact why should it be 100.....the speed limit is 70......

Yes police cars and others with permitted exemptions could still go faster...but the normal people amongst could not argue with such a measure....

The trouble is that the civil liberties nutters will say that is once again a limitation on their freedom......even though in this case it is a freedom to break the law and by doing so put other people's lives at risk.....

Answer 2

Nope. If I wish to take my car to Germany where there is no such speed restriction, then I would wish to be able to drive as fast as my car will allow me. And I would not be happy if that was 70 mph. Incidentally, the EFFECTIVE speed limit in the UK is 79 - the police will not prosecute at speeds 70 - 79 mph....
Also, if there is an emergency and I need to convey someone I love to a hospital using the dual carriageway which links my part of town to where the hospital, I damn sure want to be able to hit 120 if I have to....
There are also many places (old airfields etc) where people can go to enjoy the capabilities of their cars....
The 70 mph limit was put in place in the early 60s, when cars struggled to get there in the first place and were not equipped with the kind of braking and steering technology we have no - so the only sensible reaction is to amend the speed limit upwards. Simple speed actually kills far more rarely than the road safety muffins would have us believe

Answer 3

Yes they probaly should put limmiters in to cars, however any system they use will beable to be reprogramed and very probaly will be by lots of people,
A rev limiter also will not reduce the cause of most accidents which is speeding in built up areas. in fact it is satisticaly safer to drive over 100 mph on the motorways then to speed through a town even by as much as 10mph!

I feel that the main reason for having a fast car though is the boasting factor knowing that your car can do 200mph acording to the manufactures dose not mean that you will ever need to prove it to anyone, it is just good to know you could take it out on a race track one day .

Answer 4

When something like this comes up in the news etc., they always say the Government should do this and do that. The Government can't do what they should be doing now. Saying that they should take on something more is like closing the door AFTER the horse has gone.

I say fine the violators not with just a slap on the wrist but something that will hurt. For instance, I have seen violators in Florida who have violated some traffic violation such as speeding, their car is impounded, the license plates removed and the car is flat bedded away from the scene. I have found that Florida doesn't fool around and that's how it should be done here.

Answer 5

I agree. I think that all things not necessary should be banned i.e.:
Cars that exceed national speed limit
Carpet
Chocolate mousse
shoe polish
holidays
art galleries
McDonalds
Claudia Schiffer
CD players
Mains drainage

None of the above are necessary but make life a damn site finer. They are all also potentially dangerous (with the possible exception of chocolate mousse and Claudia Schiffer - what a combination that would be; I digress).

Once we let the interfering, self-righteous, ill-educated and mealy-mouthed killjoys take away essential liberties, you have to wonder where it will end. What will some single interest group come up with next? Banning budgies?

Thankfully, at least to a degree, we live in a free society where the Police have the power to deal with people whose behaviour, including inappropriately fast driving, is dangerous or antisocial. I suppose that accepting risk is the price of democracy.

Answer 6

If anything they should abolish speed limits all together. It is safer to drive faster than it is slow. People who drive fast pay more attention to what they are doing rather than the person going 65 talking on the phone, eating a bag of chips, and putting on nail polish. In Germany it is a felony to be doing any of the such when driving on the autobahn. There are less accidents on the autobahn in a year than there are in the US in one day. And why would you want to restrict all those people who have the means to purchase Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, Maserati...it is a beautiful thing to see one of these fine automobiles flying down the road, so if it is for your safety, stay off the highway...But to answer your question, you have to pay taxes on cars, so figure out what the taxes would be for a $50,000 car, multiply that buy the number of units sold by all the luxury high performance auto makers, and that would be a very low estimate why they dont force manufacturers to put a 70 mph restrictor...no one would buy the high end cars if they could only do 70. I know I wouldn't.

Answer 7

1. not everywhere in Europe has a 70 mph limit - if I take my car abroad I want to drive at a speed appropriate to local conditions

2. when over-taking, I want to spend as little time on the 'wrong' side of the road as possible, even if I then drop back below the speed limit once I pull in - this is a matter of safety

3. likewise there might just be a situation on a motorway where accelerating out of danger would be safer than trying to slam on the brakes - not possible if you're governed by a speed limiter

4. speed is not the cause of death or accidents on the roads - bad driving is. It's possible to drive at the speed limit and be very dangerous, just as it's possible to exceed the limit without danger in the appropriate conditions

Answer 8

the 70 mph limit is well out of date,it was set well before the days of airbags and crumple zones. modern cars stopping distances are well short of the highway codes figures.
modern cars are more than capable of higher speeds and in fact with the new euro n cap saftey ratings it is very hard to hurt yourself in a car these days.
i think the speed limit should be raised ,to say 90/100 mph.
congestion will never be solved by slowing traffic down.
speed limiters would be life threatening in a emergency hospital dash.
new cars should be fitted with gps trackers as the modern ground position satellite is capable of measuring excessive speeders and automatically computer generating a ticket.

Answer 9

until eventually those days, p.c. limits were practically continually set in accordance to the 85percenttile rule. In different words, the speed which eighty 5% of site visitors doing below. in case you pass for a larger percentage, then the reduce will be inappropriately intense (and for this reason risky), and in case you pass for a decrease percentage that's going to likely be inappropriately low (and for this reason skipped over). I remembering listening to that maximum motorways have a 20percenttile! the in ordinary words argument i will see for no longer increasing the reduce is that lorries will nevertheless in ordinary words be doing 56mph, yet that doesn't easily remember because site visitors does over eighty because that's besides. in case you create limits drivers remember on, they'll respect the limitations that are necessary. that's going to also make the reduce extra ordinary to implement, as immediately enforcement varies from officer-to-officer. If I did eighty and had an twist of destiny, might want to I be charged with intense p.c.? below the present equipment, who knows? Oh, and for the perfect time, practically all drivers do not go away their homes with the objective of dashing, they do it because they imagine that at that second in that position that's secure. those that do do not should rigidity.

Answer 10

Why not also put a device on there to turn off the "left-turn" signal when some little old lady leaves it blinking on the highway...

How about a device that slows bullets down to a non-lethal speed? Getting shot would just be like getting hit by a rock...

There are lots of things that the government "could" do to save lives or make us safer. That doesn't make it a good idea to do so....