2007-06-12 22:51:18 · 17 answers · asked by Jackal Antern 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Yes! And it would be good for Me. and since they want to die, it would be good for them too. Therefore We have a win, win, win, situation here.
2007-06-13 17:01:14 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A simple law of nature which has been proved since centuries says that Violence breeds more violence.Therefore,it's simple and logical that killing of terrorists would result in creating more terrorists.The way out seems to be to contain them in all possible ways so that they are thwarted in their attempts to harm the society and simultaneously create social ,economical ,and political conditions which discourage people,particularly the youth from taking on to terrorism.Easier said than done.That's right,bur there are no short cuts to a problem which has gained currency over many past decades.
2007-06-12 23:18:11 · answer #2 · answered by brkshandilya 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The less terrorists in the world the better the environment would be.
2007-06-12 22:54:11 · answer #3 · answered by Lunnar 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Environment? Not really. That word should have been replaced by Society, surely? I don't believe in killing anyone, but if you were to implement wholesale slaughter, then we should be fair about it.
Sure, kill all the terrorists, including those who instigate State Terrorism - A few African countries, Israel, North-Korea, USA, etc.
2007-06-13 04:10:51 · answer #4 · answered by Inkskipp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Define who is the terrorist. What if your close relative did something that everyone else would label as a terrorist attack. Would that be good for your environment? It's basically saying it is good to have revenge? But killing others makes you the same as them. so then, wouldn't you be the terrorist?
2007-06-12 23:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Be sure to bury the bodies, otherwise their rotting corpses will emit carbon back into the atmosphere!
Remember, when Bush 41 organized Desert Storm (sorry he didn't finish the job) the FIRST act of Saddam was to torch all the oil wells under his control in BOTH Kuwait and Iraq.
The pollution caused by THAT terrorist was tremendous!
2007-06-13 04:04:56 · answer #6 · answered by Philip H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Terrorism" is a military tactic, not a group of people. I believe the correct question is would killing Militant Muslim Extremists be good for the environment...and the answer is yes...yes it would.
2007-06-12 22:59:28 · answer #7 · answered by Kevin J Davis 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
killing terrorists is good for any reason you can come up with
2007-06-12 22:54:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Indubitably!
2007-06-13 10:49:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it would not be good, it would be great. The only good terrorist is a dead one.
2007-06-12 23:02:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋