Felix Trinidad or Bernard Hopkins
2007-06-12 18:00:40 · 5 answers · asked by abel 1 in Sports ➔ Boxing
Bernard Hopkins is one of the top five Middleweights of all time. Robinson, Hagler, and Monzon might rank higher but few others have the creditials to top Bernard. Tito was more of a welterweight than a middleweight, and doesn't rate as high historically as Bernard. Bernard's victory over Tarver crowned an already steller hall of fame career.
2007-06-13 04:41:18 · answer #1 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopkins, they fought at Middleweight in 2001 and Trinidad was KOd. Trinidad was outboxed all night and when Hopkins was tired of playing with him he dropped the hammer.
2007-06-13 01:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by The Official Texting Pro 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopkins.
2007-06-12 22:06:07 · answer #3 · answered by bundini 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hoplins. There can be no argument for two reasons: 1) Trinidad fought most of his career elsewhere, whereas Hopkins was the reigning champ for the longest reign in MW history I believe, and 2) Hopkins whooped Tito's *** and KO'd him.
edit:
LOL, who the hell gave me a thumb down?
2007-06-12 18:36:50 · answer #4 · answered by mowglieboy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Between those two, it is Hopkins for sure. Trinidad was much better as a welterweight.
2007-06-12 19:12:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋