Hey Toocan, Jarhead, umm 1984 to 1989? So you did what again? Nothing? Didn't think so.
It pisses me off, being a soldier who has spent almost 4 years in a combat zone, a soldier who is in one now, when i hear EX military liberals who were enlisted during times of peace try to piggy back off those of us who have put our @sses on the line ACTUALLY fighting.
Get a damn life you lose.
At least he's willing to support us and our mission, at least he doesn't call us poor and uneducated, at least he gives a rats @ss about this country. That's about 10 times more than any of you libs can say.
Harry Reid will never stop grandstanding. He's as evil as Hanoi Pelosi.
2007-06-12 14:59:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No subject what occurs, the Dems will uncover a intent to bash Bush. If the surge proves fruitful which it appears like it'll, the Dems will cry however there's no political difference. When there may be Political contract and difference they'll cry "But the overseas rebel suicide bombers are nonetheless concentrating on our troops!" This is War and regardless of who's in energy it'll keep till the complete of Iraq is patrolled via Iraqi police, troops, and exact forces ruled via a united 3 approach( Shia, Sunni, and Kurd) executive. Until that occurs we conveniently are not able to and won't go away. Otherwise Iran will push by way of Iraq be welcomed via the Syrian executive and pummel the democracy of Lebanon and march proper as much as the Israeli border. All beneath the "defense" of a nuclear umbrella. All that is, is politics. Whom could make the opposite aspect seem extra incompetent. Hence the low ballot rankings of Congress. It's approach beyond due that we roll up our sleeves and get the task performed. The loved propaganda techniques the Dem's have prescribed to given that the Vietnam warfare have dragged their as soon as first-rate Democratic get together down. It is now not what's quality for America it's ALL approximately energy grabbing and what's quality for the DNC. Shame on them. + +Your upload on Comment to Tech could be very apropos. Good task! + +DIZZ.....According in your thumbs down I might say the reverse is correct. WAKE UP. Americans desire to go away sure, however we desire it performed with a speedy victory....therefore the scale down approval rankings for Congress than Bush.
2016-09-05 14:27:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by mccowen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Harry Reid (n.) hair-ree reed - a liberal democrat, taking every opportunity to undermine troops (which he and his fellow dems voted to send to war in the first place) and embolden the enimy. Synonomous with words not allowed on Yahoo! Answers
2007-06-12 14:13:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The soldiers certainly have suffered enough. That's why we should instantly cut off all further funding for the Iraq war to bring them home. Bush is like a teenage wastrel, gambling his family's money away and spending it for vicious and destructive purposes. We are the family. It's our money he's spending, our money that allows him to kill thousands of our innocent sons and daughters and scores of thousands of innocent Iraqis. Take away the wallet and the car keys now and get those kids home!
Btw, rescinding a bad or superannuated law, something which is done routinely in legislative sessions everywhere, has nothing whatsoever to do with making laws creating crimes "ex post facto," something prohibited by the U.S. Constitution. While the Congress may pass no law subjecting someone to criminal prosecution for behavior that when performed was not illegal, Congress may certainly at any time cease authorizing anything it's previously authorized.
And while Bush, of course, can veto any funding bill that includes timetables, Congress can retaliate by not sending him any funding bill at all! Then he would have no choice but to bring his disastrous war speedily to an end and bring our soldiers back to safety.
2007-06-12 14:27:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by mika.cooper 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
Reid, like most liberal democrats, is a coward. He's too chicken to actually serve in the military, and he resents those of us who have served. He, like Pelosi, will do anything to make the military look bad. He doesn't care how many soldiers he has to kill to do that.
2007-06-13 01:14:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
A while back, someone suggested that every veteran should get one mulligan, and be able to give the liberal of choice, a good swift kick in the @ss, without penalty. Harry Reid is my choice !
2007-06-12 14:12:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Harry Reid is the most dangerous of politicians. What he does he does for his own gain with total disregard for our Country.
2007-06-12 14:11:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
You seem to like the war. Just out of curiosity, why aren't you over there fighting it if you like it so much? Cheney took 5 student deferrments during the Vietnam War, he is what you call a "chicken hawk", would that include you?
2007-06-12 14:09:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by jxt299 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
spoken like a true mamas boy whose safe at home on his computer. USMC 1984-1989. and you, you wimp? easy to spill other peoples blood is what your kind is all about. you think you so macho because your mom has a yellow magnet on her car w/ "Support the Troops".? The truth is I still have many many friends in country and they all think repubs, bush, and people like you are full of crap. wake up and smell the coffee.
2007-06-12 14:11:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Harry won't be happy until the muslim Calif takes over the US of A.
2007-06-12 14:09:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by wrflyer2001 2
·
3⤊
2⤋