Give me only ONE example of...?

Question

It is said that evolution is a result of constant mutations that over millions of years have resulted through natural selective pressures to an increase of genetic information. Therefore that parasite somehow gained the genetic information to make a flagella from somewhere.

Statistically for that to be true there has to be increase of genetic information left, right and center in order to get one mutation that will be beneficial in the short duration of the life forms found on earth.

So give me only one example of increase of genetic information, not uptake of already existing genes, not invertions of already existing genes, not a deletion that resulted in some resistance to antibiotics, just one shred of evidence of naturally occuring increase of genetic information.

Come on let's be fair you say there is no evidence of God but there is evidence of a world created by chance, show me just one of these increase of information from scratch that could prove your evolutionTHEORY

Like I said there is no evidence,

genes splitting is evidence of information already there
genes fusing is evidence of information already there
genes multiplying is evidence of the same information in greater quantity not different or new information

A prehistoric wolf-dog bred into a great dane or a pomeranian is a result of loss of information not gaining information and resulted from selecting certain already existing genes over other lost genes to breed a new breed of dog.

If they have lost their function such as the appendix, tail bone, wisdom teeth et cetera, it doesn't prove gain of information and yet they do have a function even if you haven't read about it.

Science can propose it's theories sure, but when science takes a stand on a theory and makes it a law it moves into the realm of religion and acting on faith, it is no longer science. Therefore you can BELIEVE what you want

but like I said you have no evidence, not one shred of evidence

Answer 1

eh, the appendix? They think that it was once used to grind rocks to be digested. But now that purpose would no longer be needed....so the appendix is no longer needed.

other than that..I have no idea what you are asking for.

Answer 2

So what you are saying in short is that no mutation can occur in a given genetic sequence? Everyone who suffers from an illness that is due to a genetic deficiency will be glad to know that their illness doesn't exist.

So, if there's bad mutations, why aren't they good ones giving new genetic sequences? Any genetician studying the humane genome can give you differences in different populations due to habitat pressure.

Answer 3

That is a very articulate way of saying absolutely nothing. It makes nearly no sense at all but then again that fits perfectly into the mold of the types of uneducated and simple minded morons who think some invisible friend in the sky is up there creating random crap for his own grandios amusement scheme. You should try taking some university chemistry and biology classes. The key though is having an IQ above 110 and the willingness to listen AND hear what's being said.

Answer 4

I believe there is no evidence to support macro-evolution and that God designed plants and animals with the potential to evolve within their own species. That having been said there is an example of an increase in genetic information when genes split

Gene fusion/fission is a major contributor to evolution of multi-domain bacterial proteins

Most proteins comprise one or several domains. New domain architectures can be created by combining previously existing domains. The elementary events that create new domain architectures may be categorized into three classes, namely domain(s) insertion or deletion (indel), exchange and repetition. Using `DomainTeam', a tool dedicated to the search for microsyntenies of domains, we quantified the relative contribution of these events. This tool allowed us to collect homologous bacterial genes encoding proteins that have obviously evolved by modular assembly of domains. We show that indels are the most frequent elementary events and that they occur in most cases at either the N- or C-terminus of the proteins. As revealed by the genomic neighbourhood/context of the corresponding genes, we show that a substantial number of these terminal indels are the consequence of gene fusions/fissions. We provide evidence showing that the contribution of gene fusion/fission to the evolution of multi-domain bacterial proteins is lower-bounded by 27% and upper-bounded by 64%. We conclude that gene fusion/fission is a major contributor to the evolution of multi-domain bacterial proteins.

Answer 5

this is hilarious. basically you are demanding that in order for evolution to be true, then a scientist needs to explain how "something" can come from "nothing."

what creationist like you are trying to do is present to people who have minimal expertise in biology an argument as if today's top scienctists have failed to realize how truthfull it is concerning the "evoltion-creation debate."

It's called earnest inquiry, my friend.
you can call it satan's deception till the cows come home, but it still does not detract from the dignity and sincerity of people who are just trying to understand the natural world as it most likely seems. If creation almost sounded credible, scientists would have no problem saying so. But i guess the only reason they don't is because they are intellectually dishonest and spiteful towards god. Puh-leaze.

Answer 6

From the Wolf all the dogs in the World are derived. Massive diversity from one source. Can`t be bothered to add others as you are spouting ID nonsense.

Answer 7

Wisdom Teeth

Answer 8

I doubt that they can. If 90% of mutations are bad, the species would most likely die out. Say no mouth to eat. This would be a serious one!

Answer 9

Evolutionary process the human fetus goes through is not enough for you?

The remnants of a TAILBONE?

Our genetic link to other of earths animals? (impossible in the bible unless adam and eve mated with the beasties.)

How about why there is a genetic code at all? God would not need such.

Answer 10

If I had those kind of answers would I be on here. You do make a very valid point.