English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

I find it interesting how these invasions/wars/fights always are seen as strictly religious issues.

What about more concrete reasons like oil, business, making $$, taking $$ from others, trying to stabilize or destabilize a region, etc, etc....ya know... reasons that don't have that much to do with religion but might falsely promote religion as a unifying force to get others to go along?

2007-06-12 12:14:31 · answer #1 · answered by Mike Miguel 2 · 3 2

Your grasp on history is tenuous at best.

One, the war in Iraq is not a crusade. Two, maybe they woudn't have been invaded in previous times if they hadn't invaded first.

Might want to check out why vlad dracul is considered pretty bloody and why. Or how much into what is now europe that empire raided and tried to convert to islam.

It wasn't only the white europeans that were azzhats.

2007-06-12 12:12:43 · answer #2 · answered by growlymomma 2 · 4 2

When the the real Christians take over their own countries.

2007-06-12 12:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is no more crusade as far as Christians are concern. The Allied Forces going inside Muslim countries are mixture of all religions including Islams. They are inside your territories as HUMANS to avert your inhuman ways of propagating your faith by killing innocent civilians including your own. You call it Jihad because you consider those who do not believe the way you do as infidels or evils.
It just happened that there are more Christians among your enemies but I can assure you that they never brought with them their religions to fight against you. You are the ones who always use the name of your God just to excuse yourselves for your greed for power and wealth.

2007-06-12 12:28:51 · answer #4 · answered by Rallie Florencio C 7 · 1 2

When the Muslims get a life

2007-06-12 12:36:37 · answer #5 · answered by Boogerman 6 · 0 2

To whitemaster,why don't you tell us what school you went to,or did you? You probably have never seen a copy of the holy Qurran,let alone reading it.You run your mouth hiding behind your computer,but i would be careful if i were you.You are obviously a total moron in need of some education,i bet you have slept with your mother,and sister,you do strike me as person who would do that.I invite you all to read some of his answers on other questions,and you will understand .

2007-06-12 12:31:45 · answer #6 · answered by just me 5 · 0 2

whilst the Christian Crusaders captured Jerusalem in 1099, Raymond of Agiles gave an account of what handed off "a number of our adult males decrease off the heads of their enemies; others shot them with arrows, so as that they fell from the towers; others tortured them longer by casting them into the flames. Piles of heads, hands and ft have been to be seen interior the streets of the city. It replaced into mandatory to %. one's excess of the bodies of adult males and horses. yet those have been small concerns whilst in comparison with what handed off on the temple of Solomon, a place the place non secular centers ware often chanted. What handed off there? If I tell the reality, it somewhat is going to exceed your powers of concept. So permit it suffice to assert this lots a minimum of, that interior the temple and portico of Solomon, adult males rode in blood as much as their knees and bridle reins." August C. Krey, the 1st marketing campaign: The debts of Eye-Witnesses and contributors, Pinceton & London, 1921, p. 261 This account describes the violent and barbaric action of the Crusaders. even regardless of the undeniable fact that we see a stark evaluation between those Crusaders and the movements of the Muslims whilst they recaptured Jerusalem in 1187. there replaced into no bloodbath, looting or revenge. Led by Sallahuddin Ayyubi the Muslims captured lots of the Crusaders. The Crusaders families appealed to Sallahuddin to launch them, he desperate to ransom them. even regardless of the undeniable fact that he paid the ransom for lots of them. The Christians have been pardoned and allowed to bypass away in the event that they paid a small tribute. back Sallahuddin paid this for extra or less 10000 of the people there and his brother paid for seven thousand. those too unfavourable to pay have been allotted a undeniable gate the place they could bypass away. in addition they have been presented with delivery and risk-free passage. (you are able to watch the action picture, Kingdom of Heaven which supplies a similar account.) whilst the Muslims captured Jerusalam earlier the crusades it replaced into completed with no drop of blood or any combating. it somewhat is to no longer say that Muslims in no way killed yet whilst we are speaking numbers a ways decrease than Christians.

2016-10-17 01:54:03 · answer #7 · answered by dicken 4 · 0 0

Not all people in the U.S. and the other countries are Christian.
They would not be there had they not been attacked.
Don't you recall who struck who first?
Why would you complain if there's a retaliation for an act of terrorism?

2007-06-12 12:47:59 · answer #8 · answered by Jed 7 · 1 1

Maybe when the Muslim countries stop abusing their women and killing non Muslim believers.


And when you stop asking questions that start fights... Wouldn't a peaceful question be the first step to understanding?

2007-06-12 12:12:47 · answer #9 · answered by Vindicatedfather 4 · 6 3

During the Crusades we wanted their gold and jewels.

Today, we want their oil.

When the Middle East runs out of things we want we'll stop.

2007-06-12 12:16:15 · answer #10 · answered by Buddha13 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers