English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

I think it's a definite possibility. There's got to be a reason for the rate of autism going up so much, unless, of course it just went undiagnosed before.

2007-06-12 09:00:55 · answer #1 · answered by jess v 3 · 2 1

I believe that the themarasol (not sure of spelling) which is used as a preservative in vaccines is responsible for the rise in autism. I am 50 years old. I always went to very large schools, churches, etc. and never saw another child with autism. As a teen and young adult I learned of autism. Now - I hear of that diagnosis all of the time. I have read the criteria for diagnosing autism and believe that very few if any of these children are misdiagnosed. So it is a fact that autism is on the rise. I don't know of anything else that could cause this rise in autism. Woman are getting better pre-natal care now so i don't believe it is anything that happens in utero. It is definitely something we are doing ourselves.

I don't know as a mother would decision I would make. The vaccines are important too, but...personally I would not want to take the chance. I realize the children cannot go to school without the vaccines. I would ask the doctors office if the vaccine had the thermarasol in it and insist on one which does not.

The vaccines being responsible has not been proven scientifically but so what; it is our responsibility to take care of our own children.

2007-06-12 09:12:19 · answer #2 · answered by Patti C 7 · 2 2

I definately believe there is a connection. The CDC has made it mandatory for children to get these vaccines in order to attend school, how stupid! My son is autistic and we are spending thousands on his treatment. Either there is still mercury thimerosal in these vaccines or the children who continue to be diagnosed autistic, are allergic to the viruses themselves. They can't explain away that, can they? Yes, autism always, existed, but the passive kind, or Aspergers. But not the kind where the poor kids can't develop their motor skills or speech. So why is it that autism really started to skyrocket in the late 70's and 80's and continues/ Because of the MANDATORY vaccines. Then Bill Frist and Eli Lilly went and passed The Vaccine Protection Act. Why did they do that? Their job isn't to prove that vaccines cause autism, but prove that it doesn't. Today, there is a vaccine trial going on for just this very thing.

2007-06-13 07:42:43 · answer #3 · answered by godiva 2 · 1 1

i think of that the themarasol (no longer specific of spelling) it relatively is used as a preservative in vaccines is in charge for the upward push in autism. i'm 50 years historical. I continuously went to very super colleges, church homes, and so on. and in no way observed a extra toddler with autism. As a young person and youthful person i got here upon of autism. Now - I hear of that analysis all of the time. i've got study the factors for diagnosing autism and experience that throughout straightforward terms some if any of those little ones are misdiagnosed. So it relatively is a straightforward actuality that autism is on the upward thrust. i don't be responsive to of although else that could purpose this upward thrust in autism. woman have become extra effective pre-natal care now so i do no longer think of it relatively is something that occurs in utero. it relatively is definitely some ingredient we are doing ourselves. I haven't any thought as a mom could decision i could make. The vaccines are foremost too, although...in my view i could no longer choose to take the prospect. I understand the little ones can no longer visit training with out the vaccines. i could ask the docs place of paintings if the vaccine had the thermarasol in it and demand on one that does no longer. The vaccines being to blame has no longer been well-known scientifically although so what; it relatively is our accountability to handle our very own little ones.

2017-01-06 11:35:15 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I don't believe it has been proven that the mercury is NOT part of the current rise in Autism Rates. Until the medical community can PROVE that the huge, recent spike in autism rates had nothing to do with vaccines i'll just say no, thanks.

http://thinktwice.com/

http://vaers.hhs.gov/

http://www.mothering.com/articles/growing_child/vaccines/wake.html

http://www.mothering.com/articles/growing_child/vaccines/vaccines.html

2007-06-12 09:25:23 · answer #5 · answered by Terrible Threes 6 · 3 1

I believe there is a link between vaccines and autism, and a whole list of other conditions we have yet to accurately identify.

Someone posted that it's a "genetic varriance in the gene"... Well, I would ask then: How do you suppose you GET that genetic varriance? Cancer cells are mutated cells and we know of so many chemicals in our everyday life that carcinogenic. These mutated, cancer causing cells came about through CHEMICALS, in the same way that vaccines which have chemicals in them can adversely affect our nervous system, brain, etc.

2007-06-14 16:39:52 · answer #6 · answered by Carolle746 2 · 1 1

As the mother of a 12 yr old son with autism, I can honestly say that I think it's all a crock. The reason for the mass hysteria questioning the connection between vaccines (specifically MMR) and autism is simply because the delays associated with autism become much more pronounced between 15-18 months of age. This is because that's when there is a huge leap in verbal and social skills in normal functioning toddlers that is not seen in children with autism since these are the areas affected by the condition. Additionally, the term 'autism' has grown to encompass a very broad spectrum of disorders with varying degrees of severity. Children with Aspergers' Syndrome can be extremely verbal but lack some of the most basic social skills. My son's formal diagnosis is PDD-NOS (pervasive developmental disorder - not otherwise specified) which means that he has symptoms from many of the disorders which fall under the autism spectrum but doesn't really fit into the mold of any one particular label. Fifty years ago people with autism were those sitting in a corner babbling as they rocked and flapped their hands. As the definition of autism spectrum disorders has grown and evolved, the ability to effectively diagnose people with different forms and varying degrees of these disorders has improved. I think that in 1950, my son would have been described as "simple" or "damaged" and he would not have had the opportunities that he has today. In 2007, children like my son are more likely to be described as "quiet", "shy", "introverted". They can be honor students, play sports, have girlfriends. In reference to my own son's life with autism, I can tell you that once we had a formal diagnosis I was able to really look back with great clarity and see signs and symptoms as early as 11 days old. It had nothing to do with a vaccination, he was born this way... absolutely perfect if you ask me.

2007-06-12 09:46:39 · answer #7 · answered by J 4 · 4 2

Not me.

There isn't enough evidence to substantiate this.

The incidences of autism might be rising, but that's probably because diagnosis is sharper these days - people are more on the ball in spotting conditions in children.

I think a few generations ago, such conitions were still prevalent but diagnoses did not occur - people were just a little kooky... I know a few adults that are probably autistic.

I similarly know a few children now who are diagnosed autistic and their parents are sure they displayed symptoms before they had any vaccines.

2007-06-12 09:57:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

There has been research that has suggested it. I don't know how accurate it is. There has also been research that points toward vaccines causing SIDS. I believe that because a few days after my son had his shots he died. He was only three months old and he died after getting his shots.

It's hard to say if you should get your kids vaccinated knowing these things. Although my two boys who were born after the death of my son did have their shots.

EDITED TO ADD: Kids CAN go to school without their shots. They have to sign a waiver. I know this for a fact because I used to help in my son's class and a girl there didn't have her shots and her mom just signed a waiver saying she wouldn't hold the school accountable if something happened to her child. There are religions that don't allow vaccines.

2007-06-12 09:34:46 · answer #9 · answered by musicpanther67 5 · 2 1

I don't. Every year it seems that there is a new study published that can't find any link between the two. I do know there are risks to vaccines, but we shouldn't take their benefits for granted. Kids used to die all the time from diseases we can now prevent with a shot.

2007-06-12 10:08:56 · answer #10 · answered by javamama 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers