is this what "global warming" is all about?

Question

http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2007/2007_10-19/2007-13/pdf/36-46_713_ainsworth.pdfhttp://www.aboutsudan.com/issues/population/environmental_hoaxes_based_on_population_reduction.htm
http://www.oldthinkernews.com/Articles/oldthinker%20news/global_warming_hysteria_serves_as_part2.htm
http://www.whale.to/b/genocide_q.html
according to the dictionary, conspire means:
1. to agree together, ESPECIALLY SECRETLY, to do something reprehensible or illegal: combine for an EVIL or unlawful purpose.
i think we would agree that the above links represent evil thoughts and deeds. however, the above links establish, quite clearly, that there is no secrecy; therfore there is no conspiracy!
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
"1st global revolution"-club of rome 1991

Answer 1

No. Global warming is all about science, not politics.

The data:

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png

http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html

summarized at:

http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

The position of the scientific community.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686

Good websites for more info:

http://profend.com/global-warming/

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/

http://www.realclimate.org

"climate science from climate scientists"

Answer 2

The opening words of the article from the first link are "Environmental policy today is driven by population-reduction ideology, not science", that's as far as any sensible person would read before discarding the article as extremist propoganda.

The second article is the opinion of one individual who, it would appear, has no scientific credentials. In support of his arguments the most recent source he cites is dated 1996, the rest are from the 1930's to the 1970's. I think it's fair to say that if he'd have had a valid argument he might have come up with something a bit more recent. When did you last hear a climate scientist saying "according to this report dated 1934..."

The third article is one of the funniest things I've read in a long time. The contraceptive pill and IUD are political weapons to reduce the population, the World Health Organisation is charged with infecting people with AIDS, the objective of the Women's Lib movement was to destroy the family, there is a secret government operating in the US. I've come across some weird conspiracy theories but this one is the best yet. Oh and by the way, it doesn't even mention global warming.

Answer 3

"Corporations are attacking the environment."

Please, corporations just want to make profits. If they can do it cheaper, nothing else really matters, it's not like they actually are setting out to "attack the environment" they are just trying to give people what they demand. Any time you see a corporation, they are just filling a supply for a public demand.

Global climate change has been occurring constantly since the Earth existed.

So right now the Earth IS warm compared to average.
Right now CO2 is at a level higher than it has ever been.
CO2 production per year is increasing as a result of an increasing human population and increasing standards of living.

A question: Why are so many corporations now taking the side of global warming and pushing for new regulations and laws?

Answer: They see an area to make a profit while producing no actual benefit because they are filling a demand of the public.

Example: Carbon offsets produced by burning methane given off by a landfill (cost to company=0); real effect on climate change (nothing). But a profit was made.

Answer 4

i don't think of you comprehend the words in any respect. The hyperlink below explains the distinction between international warming and climate substitute. The words have not replaced. you basically have not been paying interest. "interior of medical journals, this continues to be how both words are used. international warming refers to floor temperature will improve, even as climate substitute incorporates international warming and each and every thing else that increasing greenhouse gas quantities will impact." also, "variations to precipitation sorts and sea factor are probably to have significantly better human impression than the better temperatures on my own. for this reason, medical study on climate substitute encompasses a methods better than floor temperature substitute."

Answer 5

global warmings is humans damaging the earth by overloading the atmosphere with CO2, thus causing it to over heat and melt icebergs, kill out species, and damage earth in impossible ways. how? by burning petroleum and gas in cars and factories. "an inconvenient truth" is a must see for anyone interested. some very scary fact about earth in the next 10 years ..

Answer 6

"Global warming" is about making money.

Corporations are deliberately attacking the environment at a ferocious rate. Climate change is the environment fighting back.

Corporate law contains a fatal flaw - which allows the polluters to escape the consequences of their actions. Unless we change our world view on business we will never achieve sustainable business practices. Email us for more information.

Sgt John Rozentals
CEO Gosnells Climate Change Information Center
john.bionic - at - yahoo.com.au

www.latviantourists.com.au

Answer 7

Global warming is about the average global temperature increasing. The planet and its temperature don't give a rat's *** about your conspiracy theories, nor do the scientists who measure those temperature changes.

Answer 8

they are telling people its human caused so that they think there is something they can do about it. this is done in order to prevent widespread panic. even though there is nothing to really worry about because its all part of nature and her cycles.