If some b*tch has had sex with more than 20 men is she a sl*t? Or is it a smaller number? Or bigger? Or is it amount of times in general?
2007-06-12 08:01:57 · 18 answers · asked by KDJ 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
It's nothing to do with the number - it's the way she does it...
lots of one-night stands, super-easy etc. But in this day and age there's nothing wrong with a lot of sex
2007-06-12 08:04:29 · answer #1 · answered by Nick 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Depends on age. I knew a girl at 18 that had well over 20 and she was considered a s**t
I now know a girl at 28 that has been with over 100 and she is considered that as well.
A girl I know now as well is 31 and has slept with 20 and I would never consider her one. she dated all of them whether it be 1 month or 3 years.
It's time is all. some people will say anything over 10 is considered that but those are people that don't believe in sex before marriage and all that stuff.
2007-06-12 08:06:46 · answer #2 · answered by CoorsHeavy™ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's the amount she sleeps with within a certain time frame and how she goes about sleeping with them.
If she slept with 20 guys in ten years time then she isn't a sl*t. If she slept with 20 guys in two days time, then she is. If she did all sorts of nasty things with them also, then she's a skanky sl*t.
2007-06-12 08:08:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets lighten up a little here fellow. Women like to shop, it is in their blood. I can see what with the poor selection of men available in this day and age that it is wise to check out the merchandise before going for the extended warranty period. I have known men who likewise had a hard time making up their what passes for a mind, and I never considered them anything other than normal confused men.
2007-06-12 08:07:41 · answer #4 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i'm not a dude but as you get older you perception on labeling ppl changes drastically. U realize that u r not perfect and your partner or potential isn't perfect AND we all have pasts. but that would be above the age of 25 ppl start viewing sexual relationships differently.
Let's put it this way if u r 18 and have sex with more than 20 ppl i think the label would fit....other than that if u r 30 and still single and have slept with more than 20 ppl i would say the label is not applicable.
2007-06-12 08:06:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not a man, but if you can label us women those awful terms, I believe that you (men) should hold yourself to the same standard. It isn't right that women get labeled and not men. But to answer your question...yes, if a man or a women sleeps with (in my book) more than 6 people...than that constitues the word sl*t.
2007-06-12 08:05:49 · answer #6 · answered by Lyndsey H 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
She doesn't become a slut. She becomes a promiscuous woman, with a lot of experience under her belt.
A woman that I'd like to get into my own bedroom, becuase she really knows how to work it.
Virgins are overrated.
2007-06-12 08:04:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
um, if a woman has had more than 20 partners in her life, than she is a s*ut. a woman should not go over a hand count in her lifetime and that is almost too many. she becomes a s*ut because she gives it up to anyone and really easily.
2007-06-12 08:05:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it depends how over how long it happened if she slept with 20 in 40 years thats fine ina month id say any more than 5 and thats very slutty!!
2007-06-12 08:05:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why is it that women who sleep with a lot of men are sluts but men who sleep with alot of women are considered manly, macho, stud, and looked upon highly by their friends and other men? Society is not right.
2016-06-28 09:53:39 · answer #10 · answered by Jess S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋