English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

I believe it would be better because you think of the patient as member of your family and naturally you don't want to see your family member screwed.

2007-06-15 01:14:01 · answer #1 · answered by Curious mind 2 · 0 0

I think so. There probably wouldn't be as much of a push for medicines. Doctors get a lot of money off of perscriptions, so a lot would rather put their patients on meds. (I am not saying all do). If it was their own child, they probably wouldnt want the meds because of the possible side effects.

2007-06-12 13:58:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

as a nurse i can tell you, VIP's get much better treatment than regular joes like you and me. i recently got out of the hospital, i'm sure the rich person wouldn't have even got the bills I will be paying off for the next year. VIP's get pawned over like, well rich people. it is sickening. i basically took care of myself in the hospital but am paying for my services.

2007-06-12 13:55:08 · answer #3 · answered by bella36 5 · 0 0

It's illegal for a doctor to treat any of their relatives, but yes.

2007-06-12 14:17:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I honestly cannot answer that---DR are DR and if any of them are better than the rest its possible--Do DR know anything other than to stitch a cut? sorry I do not like must DR.

2007-06-12 13:54:59 · answer #5 · answered by lorr1941 3 · 0 0

You betcha!

2007-06-12 13:53:12 · answer #6 · answered by dellet2 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers