Don't be silly. There is no need for us to disprove the existence of something that doesn't exist. Are YOU always trying to disprove the existence of leprechauns?
2007-06-11 16:24:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by gelfling 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Atheists suffer from a form of credulity far worse than the most mis-guided fundamentalist.
Want to know the real reason atheists do not believe in God?
"Professor D.M.S. Watson, one of the leading biologists and science writers of his day, demonstrated the atheistic bias behind much evolutionary thinking when he wrote:
Evolution [is] a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible."
From the page linked below.
2007-06-11 16:25:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is no need to disprove the existence of god. The only "evidence" given for his existence is the book that self-referentially identifies itself as being the only truth. Given the numbers of factual errors, contradictions and inconsistencies in the bible, it is reasonable to dismiss it as a document of evidence even without considering the circular logic.
On the other hand, the growing body of evidence for a rational, scientific and empirically based explanation for the creation of the universe, evolution and other scientifically observable evidence of the non-existence of a god as described in the bible really places the onus of proving the existence of this fantastic being on those who believe in him.
One can call christians delusional (a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact), hate filled, pitiable, irrational or any other similar term and not actually hate christians. Unlike some of your christian supporters who call atheists' mothers whores. It sets one to wondering where the hate resides in the issue, does it not?
2007-06-11 17:30:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nodality 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
you extremely develop a good factor why is that some theory structures experience the could make all of us like them. the international is great adequate for all ideals if there is one that is greater efficient than others which would be self obtrusive and coverts will come of their very own accord.
2016-10-09 00:50:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do we need to disprove anything? The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim
2007-06-11 16:32:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I just read your earlier Questions. They hardly recommend Christianity to the rest of the world.
2007-06-11 16:29:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I never even saw your other posts. You posted something so that you would get angry answers, and now you are complaining about that.
You are the first person I have ever seen who tries to get themselves upset.
2007-06-11 16:24:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I know nothing about any of these. But the existence of god can be neither proven nor disproven, and it follows that any belief in god is useless.
2007-06-11 16:26:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's posts such as this one that make me glad I'm an agnostic.
2007-06-11 16:35:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
So basically what you are trying to say is you are attempting to justify your beliefs with anger, hatred, and violence?
2007-06-11 16:24:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Scott B 4
·
2⤊
3⤋