people think a naked woman automatically meand p0rn. as a photographer, i look at this picture and say it is incredible art. Yes, shes naked, but the naked body is captured artistically and not pornographically or s3xual. I think this is an appreciable picture and is not innapropriate whatsoever. It starts from the center and goes out, which is a sign of art. The naked body captures your attention, but then you notice colors and the water effect. Its not just a naked body. agree or disagree?
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/5742/89947amandabeardadultswig7.jpg
2007-06-11 15:08:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Definitely art. There is nothing sexual or suggestive about that picture. It is just a woman showing all of her natural beauty. As a nude beach regular that could be me on any given summer weekend (its not, but it could be).
2007-06-14 10:32:40 · answer #1 · answered by spikeit 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The human body is a thing of beauty - as this well-defined woman clearly shows. There is nothing sexual here - this is just a woman (who happens to be nude), floating in a pool of water. Notice that her curves blend well with the ripples of the water, and the way that the light highlights her skin tone...
I forget who said it, but "Erotica is something that turns you on, while Pornography is something that disgusts you" - or something along those lines.
It is our society that tells us that nudity is wrong, and to only be viewed in the bedroom (or not at all).
2007-06-11 16:05:14 · answer #2 · answered by kr_toronto 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally agree it is not porn. I think it is a very beautiful picture of a beautiful woman. BUT I also think it depends on who is doing the looking. So in the case there are minors here to young to determine which is which I would suggest this is not an appropriate place for it.
2007-06-11 15:15:00 · answer #3 · answered by Jim 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I understand what you're asserting, sounds extraordinary yet i'm a stamp collector and that i've got some stamps with nude paintings. i'm going to be truthful, it would matter on the living house, i might evaluate it no longer so offensive it became an high priced living house, yet i does in comparison to my little ones to be certain it even with what it incredibly is. even though it is not so offensive to me because it being paintings. i does no longer have an interest in it nevertheless.
2016-10-07 08:12:41 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it's porn but it is kinda freaky. Yes there is a big difference between are and porn tho. If I had to choose then I would call this Art.
2007-06-11 15:11:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would consider it nude-art.
2007-06-11 22:21:48 · answer #6 · answered by Tyler R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would think art..
2007-06-11 15:11:35 · answer #7 · answered by grneydmexi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is that your wife....then u got a BomB dude......n dat ma buddy is definately ART...u kno wat i mean....Woo...baby
2007-06-11 15:14:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
if i don't get a ***** then it's not porn. period.
2007-06-11 15:11:16 · answer #9 · answered by John H 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋