I am a Christian.....but, your post is insulting to all. grow up.
2007-06-11 10:49:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by G.C. 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
when presented with new evidence, scientists, and indeed, other logical people, can change their minds about something. like if you thought someone stole your wallet, then you found it in your couch... you would conclude it had fallen out of your pocket and not the thief was really more of a prankster who surreptitiously hid it in the cushions of your sofa.
lets use the lost wallet for another illustration; you lose your wallet and can't precisely determine where and when it went missing. you rack your brain and come up with a few ideas, maybe you left it at work or at the restaurant or perhaps it came out of your pocket as you rode in the cab. do you ever assume it was swiped by a poltergiest or some sort of gremlin? my point here is; the first few assumptions are based in logic, despite any conclusive evidence for any one of them being true, any of them COULD be true because of what is already known about human absentmindedness, yet the Gremlin hypothesis makes no sense at all because the existence of gremlins has never been proven (nor has the non-existence, either)
2007-06-11 17:59:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Dude, why are you angry? Jesus wouldn't act this way.
What does evolution and the big bang have to do with religion? Are you saying God's not powerful enough to create a universe using the big bang? And the bible doesn't contradict evolution. "A day is like a thousand years and a thousand years is like a day", right?
2007-06-11 17:45:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Peace 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
A) you're a dipsh*t.
B) Where is the link, MAN!
C) Most non christians have already researched your book and religion inside and out, deeper than you ever have obviously, and thus they have a solid ground to stand on which is backed b BRAIN USAGE. No need to listen - been there, done that, understood the falsities for what they are.
D) WTF
E) STFU
F) explain the evolutionary process a human fetus goes through.
G) explain why humans have connections in their genetic code to so many other life forms on earth.
H) Explain why there is a genetic code - god would not need one.
I) explain why there are so many religions and beliefs and why they were around before yours.
J) If adam and eve populated the world there would be one religion and no links to other life on earth, unless they boffed the animals.
2007-06-11 17:45:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Edhelosa 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
What makes you think that R&S is riddled with biochemists, geneticists, cosmologists, astrophysicists and earth scientists?
You are upset you did not get the answer you wanted. Well go to a science website and maybe you will learn something. You badly need it.
2007-06-11 18:23:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I read the answers and they did indeed pointed you directly at the answers you wanted. You obvious read none of them and your question from the start was BS. If you ask a question be serious enough about it to actually read the answers or stop wasting everyones time with your childish games.
2007-06-11 18:01:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The reason that we can't explain it is we don't have enough room to make up for what you should have learned in science class from grade 3-12. How much do you think fits in this little white box?
2007-06-11 17:47:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
I was raised Catholic. Went to church, first holy communion, confirmation and so on. I listened and didn't criticize, but like you I have the right to believe what I want. I still do not believe that earth & mankind were created by a God. Find something else to do than whine.
2007-06-11 17:45:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by aj's girl 4
·
6⤊
1⤋
What makes more sense to you: To make changes to your explanation of things as you learn more about it or to hold tight to the explanations that people came up with thousands of years ago no matter how much new information is found to prove those explanations wrong?
2007-06-11 17:44:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Maybe we didn't want to explain it because we thought your brain was to small to handle it. If you really wanted to know, you would go read a book about evolution, or at least Wikipedia.
2007-06-11 17:48:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Moxie! 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Why explain them to you again when you refused to believe us the first time?
If you give an honest, meaningful answer to my question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070611145424AAXrm7R&r=w
Then i will go though the scientific explanation of evolution again.
If you dare answer.
2007-06-11 17:59:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by Simon T 7
·
1⤊
0⤋