English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

I really tried to understand your question greenjo but i am sorry I just can't get it!

2007-06-11 07:57:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

there are maximum of issues we take with none attention or presume that as long as we've money, we will get what we would like. And that applies to food besides. How, the food is transforming into scarce OR how the food being produced genetically isn't conducive to his is none of his issue (AS he has no time or innovations on that factor.) i think of, society could take transport of one socialist innovations-set - i.e. equivalent get admission to to food. it is going to sparkling up maximum of problems like corruption, greed for money and extreme materialism that has seeped in the time of the society.

2016-10-08 23:56:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Good luck on that English as a second language course.

2007-06-11 07:18:43 · answer #3 · answered by Bethe W 4 · 0 0

You might want to collect your thoughts before spewing them onto the internet. Spell checking doesn't hurt either.

2007-06-11 07:21:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bartender. No more drinks for this Man.

2007-06-11 07:19:11 · answer #5 · answered by Ashleigh 7 · 0 0

wats ur question? i did not get exactly.....

2007-06-12 08:09:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what u on bout.

2007-06-11 08:04:21 · answer #7 · answered by mariolla oneill 5 · 0 0

?????que, no habla loco??????????

2007-06-11 07:20:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ummmmmmmm?????

2007-06-11 07:18:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WHAT??

2007-06-11 07:17:50 · answer #10 · answered by Reese Cup 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers