I'd have to see their evidence layed out in front of me, but there seems to be little scientific evidence to support Dinosaur/human co-existence. At least not if you exclude the Jurassic Park movies.
2007-06-11 03:43:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by tdubya86 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Incorrect, I have been to Dr Carl Baugh's Museum as it is only a 45 minute drive from me, and I watch his show on the Trinity Broadcast network Tuesday Evenings at 6:00 p.m. CST
I agree with all except the assertion that Evolutionist are whores and internet porn junkies.
This is incorrect.
No such assertion is made.
Some Christians have labeled atheists as evil, stupid, devil-worshippers, or morally void. Though there may be some atheists who fit these categories (as would many in the general population), atheists are not categorically evil, stupid, devil-worshipping, degenerates with no morals. Many of them are fine citizens, honest, caring, loving, and patient. For a Christian, or anyone for that matter, to make a blanket statement about atheists in a derogatory manner is wrong. It is the same thing atheists sometimes do when they accuse Christians of being irrational, psychotic, or stupid. Such accusations have no place on either side of the argument of truth.
Generally speaking, atheists are not stupid. Many of them have thought through their position over a long period of time and arrive at conclusions after much thought. Some were raised in religious homes, have seen what religion has to offer, and have rejected it. Of course, I think that atheists have drawn incorrect conclusions about God, but it doesn't mean they are dumb. Some atheists have presented very cogent arguments against the existence of God, which need to be addressed.
So, just because someone believes in God and encounters someone who doesn't, that does not mean that either side is stupid. Labeling and name-calling have no place in the discussion.
2007-06-11 10:47:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I believe in Creationism. However I do not agree with the Creation Museum because it's teaching things from a Christian perspective which I do not adhere to.
2007-06-11 10:40:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by kfount400 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't seen the museum but I'll bet I agreee with alot of it.I lean toward an old earth and a re-done creation.Something was here ,got wiped out and that's why Adam was told to Replenish the earth.
The Paulaxey river fossils show dinosaur and mans footprint in the same place.The Ica Rocks of Peru(Engravings thousands of years old) show men killing a stegasaurus and taming other Dinos.The Fish Coelancanth with little arm like apendages was thought to be extinct a billion years ago,one was caught recently,alive, and looked exactly like his billion year old Fossil.The joke is ,they said with those little arms,it was evolving,and yet it is exactly as it was a billion years ago.
2007-06-11 10:52:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by AngelsFan 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, humans and "dinosaurs" (notice the quotations, the Bible mentions Behemoth and large animals) co-exisited.
Yes, scientific evidence points to a young earth. (see source for more info)
No, I do not agree that Evolutionists are whores or junkies. They are men and women that are simply mistaken and confused.
2007-06-11 10:46:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by TG 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
ooh to the poster who said "prove it wrong if you can".. I can! I can !! And, I can do it without proving creation itself wrong too..
The creation museum puts dinosaurs on the ark with Noah, and claims that all dinosaurs were vegetarian until Adam sinned... they claim that T-rex was God's punishment on Adam for that sin.
Someone forgot to tell them to look in the bible.. Noah comes AFTER Adam's sin, and therefore the dinos would've eaten him.
Thank you, please come again.
2007-06-11 10:45:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kallan 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not exactly, but its more credible than the big bang.
2007-06-11 11:18:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
prove it wrong, if you can?
2007-06-11 10:41:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by allahdevil1 3
·
0⤊
1⤋